<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Advogato blog for splork</title>
    <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/splork/</link>
    <description>Advogato blog for splork</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <generator>mod_virgule</generator>
    <pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 02:52:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2002 01:19:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>24 Oct 2002</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/splork/diary.html?start=21</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/splork/diary.html?start=21</guid>
      <description>Places where policy doesn't belong...

&lt;p&gt; A former boss asked on a mailing list if anyone knew how various OSes chose their source ports for TCP and UDP connections.  we got answers.  i decided to look at the code and supply an answer for linux 2.4.18 and found the following default source port ranges:

&lt;p&gt; &lt;pre&gt;
  If the system has &amp;gt;=128mb of ram:
     32768-61000
  If the system has 64-127mb of ram:
     1024-4999
  If the system has 32-63mb of ram:
     2048-4999
  If the system has &amp;lt;32mb ram:
     3072-4999
&lt;/pre&gt;

&lt;p&gt; Sigh.  Why?  This is a policy decision.  If someone has a system with low memory and thinks that this will actually make a difference to their system:  &lt;em&gt;Run sysctl in a startup script!&lt;/em&gt;  sheesh.

&lt;p&gt; Note also that the IANA standard for source ports says to pick a number between 49152 - 65535.

&lt;p&gt; Maybe I'll write up a patch, post it and be laughed at.  Or maybe i'll be lazy...</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Mon, 7 Oct 2002 23:58:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>7 Oct 2002</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/splork/diary.html?start=20</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/splork/diary.html?start=20</guid>
      <description>&lt;a href="http://www.advogato.org/person/daniels/" &gt;daniels&lt;/a&gt; i don't keep up with the lkml these days but I went looking when you mentioned bitkeeper annoyances.  heh.  i couldn't agree more.  larry mcvoy is an asshole.  i don't care how good bitkeeper may be; its attitudes like his that make bitkeeper pointless to use.
</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Mon, 8 Jul 2002 19:10:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>8 Jul 2002</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/splork/diary.html?start=19</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/splork/diary.html?start=19</guid>
      <description>yippee.  i like the new posting indicator and trust metric score displays.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2002 18:24:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>31 Jan 2002</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/splork/diary.html?start=18</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/splork/diary.html?start=18</guid>
      <description>*please* can't we simply prevent duplicate story postings in
the advogato software!  computers are good at that kind of
thing.
</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2001 21:56:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>19 Jul 2001</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/splork/diary.html?start=17</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/splork/diary.html?start=17</guid>
      <description>Joined the &lt;a href="http://eff.org/" &gt;EFF&lt;/a&gt; using paypal
today with the "DMCA" listed as the reason.  (thanks for the
reminder in someone elses diary, I had been meaning to do that).

&lt;p&gt; Also sent a suggestion to &lt;a
href="https://paypal.com/"&gt;paypal&lt;/a&gt;:  I would like a way
to show proof of payment to third parties.  (so that Alice
can prove to
prove to Cathy that she paid Bob).

&lt;p&gt; It could be done
either requiring Cathy to be a paypal user (they would like
that I'm sure) or alternatively to anyone not even being a
user by making the page a "one-shot" that after the viewer
clicks a "confirm that i have read the proof" button it goes
away [so that one proof couldn't be used multiple times].

&lt;p&gt; I suggested it for the purpose of selling items saying
"proceeds will be donated to the EFF" (or charity of choice
that accepts paypal).  That way buyers could be sent proof
of the truth in that statement.

&lt;p&gt; The alternative "fun" use would be for thugs to get proof
from you that you made your weekly blackmail payment to the
thug's boss.
</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Mon, 2 Jul 2001 22:23:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>2 Jul 2001</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/splork/diary.html?start=16</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/splork/diary.html?start=16</guid>
      <description>&lt;a href="http://www.advogato.org/person/vab/" &gt;vab&lt;/a&gt;: take a look a &lt;a href="http://www.advogato.org/proj/Mojo%20Nation/" &gt;Mojo Nation&lt;/a&gt;
for your free
software distribution p2p network idea.  Using a p2p network
such as mojonation or freenet to distribute packages would
be excellent.  (can anyone drool as they envision apt-get
using a p2p network to get packages instead of silly
ftp/http mirrors)

&lt;p&gt; Mojonation and freenet both have the advantage of
content being addressed by secure hashes.  The only thing
that
would need to be signed (if you actually implementing
signing) are the indexes that list what the hash ids needed
to get the packages are.
</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Mon, 7 May 2001 23:59:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>7 May 2001</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/splork/diary.html?start=15</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/splork/diary.html?start=15</guid>
      <description>yippee, its been a while in the making - we "shipped" a &lt;a
href="http://mojonation.net/"&gt;new version 0.970 of
mojonation&lt;/a&gt; today.

&lt;p&gt; i went for a bike ride in the morning after dropping my car
off for its regular service &amp;amp; smog.  i (foolishly:)
volunteered to go on a 40 mile
morning ride with a friend in a couple days, i need to build
up my
endurance again.
</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2001 03:11:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>14 Mar 2001</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/splork/diary.html?start=14</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/splork/diary.html?start=14</guid>
      <description>xgavin pointed out a nice article on irc: &lt;a
href="http://forums.itworld.com/webx?14@139.drRfa36vgId^0@.ee6eed4/11"&gt;Robert
C Martin on expressiveness and language choice&lt;/a&gt;.  Of
course I call it good because it pretty much sums up a lot
of what I believe. :)</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Thu, 7 Dec 2000 02:16:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>7 Dec 2000</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/splork/diary.html?start=13</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/splork/diary.html?start=13</guid>
      <description>PlayStation 2's are evil, they take up too much time.  My
roommate won one from a radio station last week.  Oh darn.
:)</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Wed, 4 Oct 2000 00:08:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>4 Oct 2000</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/splork/diary.html?start=12</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/splork/diary.html?start=12</guid>
      <description>Released a new version of the python interface to BerkeleyDB
3.1 today. It now works with python 1.5.2
and 1.6 out of the box.  &lt;a
href="http://electricrain.com/greg/python/bsddb3/"&gt;Get
py-bsddb3 2.2.0 here&lt;/a&gt;.

&lt;p&gt; I am very happy with the python distutils package.  I just
converted py-bsddb3 to use it.  I have noticed the
roughness around the edges in terms of unimplemented or
undocumented features but the code is easy enough to read to
quickly figure out what it can currently do.  (though I do
have to say I prefer undocumented features to unimplemented
but documented features!)

&lt;p&gt; (sigh) I should join the python-dev mailing list. 
For a while py-bsddb3 was being considered for addition to
the next python release but I haven't been able to follow up
on that.  Someone even started creating an un-swigified
version that I should try and make time to follow up on.

&lt;p&gt; busy busy busy...
</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
