<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Advogato blog for slef</title>
    <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/slef/</link>
    <description>Advogato blog for slef</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <generator>mod_virgule</generator>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 12:28:31 GMT</pubDate>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 07:04:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Wireless Networking on this Clevo</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/slef/diary.html?start=888</link>
      <guid>http://www.news.software.coop/wireless-networking-on-this-clevo/1457/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;This Clevo laptop is a new machine and like a lot of new machines, not all of its hardware has drivers in the current stable release of debian. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Happily, there is a driver for its rtl8723ae wireless networking device in the later 3.8 Linux kernel versions. So it&#x2019;s just a case of installing the package called &#x201C;kernel-package&#x201D; and following the instructions in it, to make a new linux-image package with the latest drivers in it. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One small thing which tripped me up is that you usually need to write &#x201C;make-kpkg &#x2013;rootcmd fakeroot &#x2013;initrd kernel-image&#x201D; now. I forgot the &#x201C;&#x2013;initrd&#x201D; option at first.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 07:04:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Debian Project Leader 2013 election campaign links: part 1</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/slef/diary.html?start=887</link>
      <guid>http://www.news.software.coop/debian-project-leader-2013-election-campaign-links-part-1/1450/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;This is basically a link-post to the Debian Project Leader email discussions on GMANE&#x2019;s blog-style interface to debian-vote. After only 3 days of the 21, there&#x2019;s already a pageful, so if I don&#x2019;t start collecting links now, I&#x2019;ll probably miss some.  Right or wrong, I&#x2019;ve grouped these into three topics:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h3&gt;The Job&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.vote/16289" &gt;Why do you think you are a good candidate for DPL&lt;/a&gt; (10 Mar 2013)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.vote/16293" &gt;How do you plan to represent Debian externally?&lt;/a&gt; (10 Mar 2013)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.vote/16327" &gt;about a DPL board&lt;/a&gt; (12 Mar 2013)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.vote/16348" &gt;DPL term duration&lt;/a&gt; (12 Mar 2013)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.vote/16347" &gt;Work balance and traveling&lt;/a&gt; (12 Mar 2013)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.vote/16299" &gt;trying to do awesome and risking to fail&lt;/a&gt; (11 Mar 2013)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.vote/16349" &gt;To Lucas: how do you plan to push your ideas&lt;/a&gt; (12 Mar 2013)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.vote/16378" &gt;All candidates &#x2013; quotes for the press if you win&lt;/a&gt; (13 Mar 2013)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Money&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.vote/16326" &gt;using debian funds for Debian&#x2019;s hardware infrastru&lt;/a&gt; (12 Mar 2013)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.vote/16335" &gt;Usage of Debian&#x2019;s Money&lt;/a&gt; (12 Mar 2013)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.vote/16337" &gt;Debian&#x2019;s relationship with money and the economy&lt;/a&gt; (12 Mar 2013)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Project Management&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.vote/16290" &gt;getting new people to Debian&lt;/a&gt; (10 Mar 2013)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.vote/16304" &gt;Free Software challenges and Debian role&lt;/a&gt; (11 Mar 2013)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.vote/16295" &gt;Development and technical issues and challenges&lt;/a&gt; (10 Mar 2013)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.vote/16352" &gt;Are there problematic infrastructure or processes in Debian?&lt;/a&gt; (12 Mar 2013)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.vote/16309" &gt;to Moray: encourage teams to take interns&lt;/a&gt; (11 Mar 2013)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;&lt;p&gt;So, what do you think are the key points or differences? Leave me a comment, or get involved in the discussions. Campaigning ends and voting begins 30/31 March.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 07:04:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>In Praise of Consensus</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/slef/diary.html?start=886</link>
      <guid>http://www.news.software.coop/in-praise-of-consensus/1445/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.debian.org/devel/constitution" &gt;The constitution of the debian operating system project&lt;/a&gt; says things like &#x201C;consistent with the consensus of the opinions of the Developers&#x201D; at various points but doesn&#x2019;t say how strong a consensus or how the project will test for consensus.  I think those were mistakes, breaking a couple of the &lt;a href="http://seedsforchange.org.uk/shortconsensus#conditions" &gt;conditions for consensus&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Consensus" &gt;Wikipedia&#x2019;s understanding of consensus&lt;/a&gt; is even worse.  Wikipedia seems to treat consensus as a synonym for unanimity. Its testing methods allow an infinite loop to form where the casual observer can&#x2019;t differentiate between a controversial proposal and consensus.  I think those were mistakes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;These famous-but-imperfect implementations frequently lead to misdirected rants which seem to misunderstand consensus as requiring perpetual bikeshedding. &lt;a href="http://apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html#decision-making" &gt;Apache&#x2019;s implementation&lt;/a&gt; is rather better &#x2013; and it may surprise you to learn that &lt;a href="http://www.software.coop/" &gt;our co-op&lt;/a&gt; is mostly run by consensus.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are two key differences which I feel makes consensus work for us: we&#x2019;ve set limits beforehand on some decisions where we need to act fast &#x2013; where not making a decision would usually be the same as making a bad decision &#x2013; and our methods of testing for consensus are better.  We test for consensus with secret-at-vote-time-but-published-after straw polls, or using &lt;a href="http://www.neweconomics.org/projects/crowd-wise" &gt;Crowd Wise&lt;/a&gt; by email.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I summarise Crowd Wise as follows: gather all ideas plus option 0 (do nothing) if possible, carry out a de Borda (preference) voting round 1, merge/amend/consolidate ideas, voting round 2 if needed.  It does still work better if participants put their ego aside a little and co-operate, but it does put limits on non-co-operators.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anyway, as described in &lt;a href="http://xana.scru.org/xana2/bamamba/consensed/" &gt;Xana/ xana2/ bamamba/ Why Russ is wrong&lt;/a&gt;, debian isn&#x2019;t exactly using consensus much at the moment, anyway. Should we try to fix its bugs? Do you know other projects where consensus is working?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Fri, 8 Feb 2013 07:04:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Clevo 7872-9040/A built Jan 13 with Debian 6</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/slef/diary.html?start=885</link>
      <guid>http://www.news.software.coop/clevo-7872-9040a-built-jan-13-with-debian-6/1441/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;My trusty Asus seems to have succumbed to graphic fault. I got an OS-free Zoostorm as its replacement, to avoid paying the MS tax. Zoostorm is one brand that Clevo laptops are sold under. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It was actually a Clevo 7872-9040/A built Jan 13. I installed Debian 6 on it. The download button was easy to spot on the front page, but I actually used mini.iso so I could use a smaller usb stick. The first larger stick I tried was a dud and I&#x2019;m not sure where other sticks went in the move. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The base installation went fine and most things went well, but the wireless networking and sound required an upgrade, but more on that next tech post.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Thu, 7 Feb 2013 07:04:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>One of them, one of us</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/slef/diary.html?start=884</link>
      <guid>http://www.news.software.coop/one-of-them-one-of-us/1439/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting stuff is happening again and I&#x2019;m doing a bit of travelling where I&#x2019;m not driving much, so I can write some blog posts. If this train stops bouncing quite so much! &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think most readers are interested in technology and collaborative work, so it makes sense to alternate those two themes most of the time. So that&#x2019;s what I&#x2019;ll aim for, probably a few posts each week for the next few weeks. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Let me know in the comments or &lt;a href="http://www.software.coop/" &gt;our co-op&lt;/a&gt;&#x2019;s contract form if there&#x2019;s anything in particular you&#x2019;d like us to cover, else I&#x2019;ll start with my recent experiences installing Debian 6 on a new laptop and the fun of running a business at tax return time.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 07:04:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>We Have Moved! Again!</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/slef/diary.html?start=883</link>
      <guid>http://www.news.software.coop/we-have-moved-again/1432/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;With immediate effect, &lt;a href="http://www.software.coop/" &gt;our co-op&lt;/a&gt; is now at:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;384 Lynn Road, Setchey, Norfolk PE33 0PD&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Please send any official post there instead of Somerset or London, because the forwarding is slow and I expect it to miss a few items.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Our telephone numbers and email addresses remain the same, of course. It&#x2019;s still best to use the contact form on our website.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 16:04:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Please vote for police commissioners</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/slef/diary.html?start=882</link>
      <guid>http://www.news.software.coop/please-vote-for-police-commissioners/1429/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Contrary to http://blog.einval.com/2012/11/13, I&#x2019;ve just been and voted (four times, or 2&#xD7;2 &#x2013; one for me, one as a proxy) for &lt;a href="http://www.choosemypcc.org.uk" &gt;a police and crime commissioner&lt;/a&gt;. I agree with much of what Steve writes and more besides. It&#x2019;s a very bad election. But I voted for three main reasons: Firstly, parties I don&#x2019;t like will get their core vote out anyway. If we don&#x2019;t turn put, the election becomes more about party structures, less the popular wish. Secondly, &lt;a href="http://www.news.software.coop/categories/democracy/" &gt;democracy&lt;/a&gt; is imperfect, but it&#x2019;s the best we&#x2019;ve got. I&#x2019;ve interacted with two appointed police authorities and they&#x2019;re rubbish and they&#x2019;re untouchable/unaccountable. Thirdly, I expect policing to be a hot topic here if the government do actually try to build the incinerator that 65,000 people/90+% voted against. Best try to get a non-gov commissioner now, I think. So that&#x2019;s why I&#x2019;ve voted and encouraged other members of &lt;a href="http://www.software.coop/" &gt;our co-op&lt;/a&gt; to vote.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Wed, 7 Nov 2012 07:06:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Adrift @coopsutd in @coopParty workshop</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/slef/diary.html?start=881</link>
      <guid>http://www.news.software.coop/adrift-coopsutd-in-coopparty-workshop/1417/</guid>
      <description>&lt;div style="width: 370px"&gt;
  &lt;img title="IMG_20121101_122345_0.jpg" class="alignright" alt="image" src="http://www.news.software.coop/wp-content/blogs.dir/6/files/2012/11/wpid-IMG_20121101_122345_01.jpg"/&gt;&lt;p&gt;Welney washes&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sometimes I felt at home at &lt;a href="http://www.news.software.coop/categories/cooperatives-sw/" &gt;Cooperatives&lt;/a&gt; United, like at the wonderful fringe dinner at &lt;a href="http://www.eighth-day.co.uk/" &gt;Eighth Day&lt;/a&gt; last Thursday night. Sometimes I felt overwhelmed by the flood, like at the cooperative party workshop on Friday morning. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The workshop addressed the key questions: why do we want cooperative politicians, what could they do and what are the needs and challenges facing them? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Personally, I felt the first is obvious and the answer is all the second. It&#x2019;s both frustrating (few ask why other movements want to influence politicians) and reassuring (no taboo topics) that the first question is asked. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There were many fascinating answers to the other two questions from around the world. As so often with workshops, few hard conclusions were reached, but I think some interesting conversations were started there, which we might hear again in the future. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What would I call the top challenge? Persuading open and transparent co-op members to join the party. I&#x2019;ve written about my difficulty with joining political parties in the past, as some forms of collective responsibility are against my beliefs and I&#x2019;m not sure that joining a small party will help anyone much, but I think I&#x2019;ll take another look at &lt;a href="http://party.coop" &gt;the cooperative party&lt;/a&gt;, all the same.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The picture above is of the &lt;a href="http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ouse_Washes" &gt;Welney washes&lt;/a&gt;, some miles south-west of Lynn. It&#x2019;s a stunning wetland environment, and it surprises me every time the train crosses the floods, as it did on the way to Manchester. And yes, I&#x2019;ve shoehorned a picture I liked into this article!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Wed, 7 Nov 2012 07:06:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Why co-ops and social enterprises should avoid publishing Word files</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/slef/diary.html?start=880</link>
      <guid>http://www.news.software.coop/why-co-ops-and-social-enterprises-should-avoid-publishing-word-files-online/1373/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I sometimes ask other co-ops and social enterprises to publish things as web pages, PDFs, ODFs or basically any standard format instead of Microsoft Word Doc files.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Doc files have the practical problem that they look different even in different versions of Microsoft Word, but also, Microsoft is not a co-operative (a private-sector firm oft accused of bring a monopolist, in fact!), whereas PDF, ODF and so on are more co-operatively developed, so I feel that we should support the better alternatives.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The usual first move is to PDFs. I don&#x2019;t like them as much as web pages (it&#x2019;s a file to download and open in an app or plugin, rather than something I can just read without interrupting my flow), but the process is basically the same. Just upload a PDF where you would have uploaded a Doc.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Occasionally, I get a reply saying that PDF is no better than Word because Adobe are also a private-sector supplier and therefore not much different from Microsoft (not as big, though?), while doc files are an ISO standard too.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&#x2019;m careful to suggest using ISO PDFs rather than Adobe PDFs. Although PDF started with Adobe, it was given to &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PDF#PDF_1.7" &gt;an independent ISO process&lt;/a&gt; (currently co-chaired by someone from Microsoft, which amuses me) and so software to read it has been developed by a wide range of people, including &lt;a href="http://www.software.coop/" &gt;our co-op&lt;/a&gt; in a small part.  You can &lt;a href="http://pdfreaders.org" &gt;find some non-Adobe software for reading PDFs at http://pdfreaders.org&lt;/a&gt; &#x2013; there is also alternative PDF creation software, such as that built-in to &lt;a href="http://libreoffice.org" &gt;libreoffice&lt;/a&gt;, but I don&#x2019;t know of a good similar listing for them.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Microsoft have only given part of Doc (called Docx) to the ISO process and there is a limited range of other readers for it, which suffer the same &#x201C;different on every version&#x201D; problem as Word as far as I&#x2019;ve seen. There&#x2019;s also the added complication that Microsoft Office reportedly won&#x2019;t comply with the Strict standard before Office 2013&#x2026;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;More widely, Microsoft are so un-cooperative that they don&#x2019;t seem to want to share a marketplace with anyone else and have been hauled in front of regulators numerous times for monopoly offences.  &lt;a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/eu-to-decide-if-microsoft-broke-antritrust-ruling-2012-09-27" &gt;They seem to be on their way there again.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So Adobe is not great (does its best to continue marketing and extending PDF as if it had sole control), but Microsoft is much worse.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ISO ODF and web pages are other possibilities.  The ODF standards are mainly developed by the democratic non-profit &lt;a href="https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=office" &gt;Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards&lt;/a&gt;, while web standards are mainly developed by &lt;a href="http://www.w3c.org/" &gt;an unincorporated trade consortium, the W3C&lt;/a&gt;.  While they are not themselves co-operatives, co-operatives can be members of both of those.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So, whatever the problem, please prefer to publish web pages, PDF or ODF files, rather than Microsoft Word Doc files.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Mon, 5 Nov 2012 20:04:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>Seize the Media! @theBoyler @coopsutd</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/slef/diary.html?start=879</link>
      <guid>http://www.news.software.coop/seize-the-media-theboyler-coopsutd/1411/</guid>
      <description>&lt;div style="width: 370px"&gt;
  &lt;img title="IMG_20121101_230010_0.jpg" class="alignright" alt="image" src="http://www.news.software.coop/wp-content/blogs.dir/6/files/2012/11/wpid-IMG_20121101_230010_0.jpg"/&gt;&lt;p&gt;1 Angel Square&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So when I arrived on Thursday (ten minutes early despite a cancelled train, thanks to help from the cooperative fellow traveller mentioned last post), I was in time to go to a workshop on media &lt;a href="http://www.news.software.coop/categories/cooperatives-sw/" &gt;cooperatives&lt;/a&gt; led by @theBoyler.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It wasn&#x2019;t what I expected. It seemed to concentrate on the opportunity presented by the current awful state of news media companies in many countries and the technology-driven changes to their businesses. For example, WordPress is a viable way to start &#x2013; online first, then move into print later.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are already news co-ops in places where there would be no local news media. The challenge well be how to overcome what I&#x2019;d call &#x201C;spoiling&#x201D; or &#x201C;scorched earth&#x201D; tactics from departing media companies. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Some local news media owners are looking for a way out. One obvious one is to turn a local title into a minor variation on a regional-or-worse service or publication, maybe by selling it to a bigger media business. That loses some audience but many will put up with it, so it avoids creating an obvious gap in the market for more truly local reporting. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Much else was covered and the audience suggested tons of examples. I&#x2019;m not sure we reached many firm conclusions, but there seem quite a few examples to learn from (&lt;a href="http://www.morningstaronline.co.uk" &gt;Morning Star&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.taz.de" &gt;taz&lt;/a&gt;, &#x2026;) and Dave Boyle&#x2019;s work is continuing&#x2026;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
