<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Advogato blog for nipper</title>
    <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/nipper/</link>
    <description>Advogato blog for nipper</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <generator>mod_virgule</generator>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 20:18:27 GMT</pubDate>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2001 08:45:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>25 Apr 2001</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/nipper/diary.html?start=6</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/nipper/diary.html?start=6</guid>
      <description>Haven't posted for a while. Bit busy...

&lt;p&gt; In my spare time I've been working on some "TINI" projects. 
TINI is Dallas Semiconductors single board Java computer 
thang...

&lt;p&gt; First open source release for me is TINI Rapt - which is a 
cron style daemon for the board. You can find it at &lt;a href="http://sourceforge.net/projects/tinirapt/" &gt;Sourceforge
&lt;/a&gt; but unless you've got a board yourself you won't have 
much joy in using it!

</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Wed, 8 Nov 2000 09:13:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>8 Nov 2000</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/nipper/diary.html?start=5</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/nipper/diary.html?start=5</guid>
      <description>Been helping setup for a show in London's Olympia over the 
last couple of days. &lt;a href="http://www.mbusiness.co.uk" &gt;MBusiness.co.uk&lt;/a&gt; is 
their web site.

&lt;p&gt; The show itself will be the usual dull corporate affair 
methinks - I've got a couple of reasonably cool demos on 
show so I'm popping over this afternoon to see how they're 
going down...

&lt;p&gt; Tomorrow is definitely going to be a slow day - going out 
tonight with some old chums from a previous company venture 
that went bust. We're all still drinking mates and as a lot 
of them will be at the show (in other guises) &lt;b&gt;and&lt;/b&gt; 
the original pub we used to go to is just down the road 
from the hall we're going down there to reminisce. Pass me 
the aspirin!</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Mon, 6 Nov 2000 09:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>6 Nov 2000</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/nipper/diary.html?start=4</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/nipper/diary.html?start=4</guid>
      <description>Currently doing some work on &lt;b&gt;refactoring&lt;/b&gt; some code 
from way back when (at least 18 months). Unfortunately I'd 
forgotten what was going through my mind when I wrote the 
code (it's a parser for HTML that converts a web page to 
XML which can be then transformed back to HTML, XML, WML 
etc.). Refactoring's the best way to get to grips with the 
code! (see &lt;a href="http://www.martinfowler.com" &gt;
http://www.martinfolwer.com&lt;/a&gt; for more info on 
refactoring...)</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Fri, 3 Nov 2000 12:13:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>3 Nov 2000</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/nipper/diary.html?start=3</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/nipper/diary.html?start=3</guid>
      <description>So - one of my client companies has just closed 
&lt;b&gt;another&lt;/b&gt; round of financing. Strangely enough, it 
didn't need the money, but thought it might as well get the 
money in whilst it was on offer. Don't know about the terms 
attached though.

&lt;p&gt; Seems strange how so many companies with &lt;i&gt;fairly weak&lt;/i&gt; 
ideas can attract investment. From what I've seen, the 
investors are betting on the people rather than the 
technology - and they also like people who have failed at 
least once already. Something about &lt;i&gt;experience&lt;/i&gt; of 
failure. I just wonder what's the optimal amount of 
failures? 2? 3? Maybe an interesting dot-com idea is one 
where you get a limited amount of funding, spend it all, 
and all of the founders are now &lt;b&gt;more experienced&lt;/b&gt; and 
can move up the "investment" ladder.

&lt;p&gt; I should franchise that...</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Thu, 2 Nov 2000 14:49:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>2 Nov 2000</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/nipper/diary.html?start=2</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/nipper/diary.html?start=2</guid>
      <description>Off to a conference next week at Olympia in London - "M-
commerce" type thing. 

&lt;p&gt; Amusing thing is that I've got three 
of my consulting clients exhibiting there and two of them 
have stands next to each other. What's &lt;i&gt;amusing&lt;/i&gt; is 
that the software I created for two of them is very 
similar - 
not at the actual source code level, but in a "design 
pattern" kind of way because I had the same thought 
processes when designing it. So both of the products have 
similar frameworks and therefore the selling points are 
based around the same framework.

&lt;p&gt; Some neat hack demos there are down to me and a mate as 
well. Should be fun wandering around anyways and seeing 
what the 
marketing types are making of it all...</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Wed, 1 Nov 2000 10:11:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>1 Nov 2000</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/nipper/diary.html?start=1</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/nipper/diary.html?start=1</guid>
      <description>Had a good meeting last night with some guys from a mobile 
networking company. They would like to think they've solved 
a latency problem with mobile TCP/IP.

&lt;p&gt; Unfortunately, their attitude to their work was similar to 
that relating to cryptographic algorithms. 
&lt;b&gt;Especially&lt;/b&gt; when I mentioned that there were a number 
of RFCs specifically related to latency problems with "long 
thin pipes" (long transmission time, not much bandwidth). 
So, like the amateur guy with the brand new encryption 
algorithm, they think they know better (which they may do), 
but aren't prepared to release their "algorithm" for peer 
review. (And not even prepared to release it to me - a 
friendly consultant under NDA!).

&lt;p&gt; They mainly want me to work out how to productise their 
solution. Quite difficult when you don't know what it 
does...</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2000 12:42:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>31 Oct 2000</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/nipper/diary.html?start=0</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/nipper/diary.html?start=0</guid>
      <description>OK - just joined the site.

&lt;p&gt; Some brief background information - I'm based in the UK and 
work as a contractor to companies wanting to develop "m-
commerce" applications. Usually written in Java.

&lt;p&gt; In my &lt;i&gt;spare&lt;/i&gt; time, I also run a company called Kimian 
Technologies - we're writing some cool open source code 
stuff based around SMS (mobile phone text messages for the 
uninitiated) and also stuff relating to gaming on the next 
generation mobile phones.

&lt;p&gt; Watch this space for more entries...</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
