<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0.">
  <channel>
    <title>Advogato blog for morcego</title>
    <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/morcego/</link>
    <description>Advogato blog for morcego</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <generator>mod_virgule</generator>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 13:57:29 GMT</pubDate>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Tue, 2 Jul 2002 19:29:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>2 Jul 2002</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/morcego/diary.html?start=42</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/morcego/diary.html?start=42</guid>
      <description>Just a quick entries:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.advogato.org/proj/privoxy/" &gt;privoxy&lt;/a&gt; is nearing the 3.0 release. Looks very good.
&lt;li&gt;Our internet link is getting better by the day. TG.
&lt;li&gt;Linux in Brazil (see previous post) is consuming a fair amount of my time, but the work we are doing there is really nice.
&lt;li&gt;I dropped the site engine project for now. Don't have time for it
&lt;li&gt;I'm planning of buying a DVD-drive for my computer. The prices are a little more attractive right now
&lt;li&gt;The &lt;a href="http://www.advogato.org/proj/reply-o-matic/" &gt;reply-o-matic&lt;/a&gt; project is at a standstill. It's working nicely on every place I have it running, and I have received some very positive feedback
&lt;li&gt;I'm having a hard time trying to figure out why a PCMCIA network card that works on kernel 2.2 does not work on 2.4. It's kind of wierd.
&lt;/ul&gt;
</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2002 20:38:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>28 May 2002</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/morcego/diary.html?start=41</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/morcego/diary.html?start=41</guid>
      <description>Well, as usual, it is a long time since my last entry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notice that &lt;a href="http://www.advogato.org/proj/ijbswa/" &gt;ijbswa&lt;/a&gt; changes 
named, and is now
named &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.advogato.org/proj/privoxy/" &gt;privoxy&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Things a, also as usual, pretty messy around here. A few
updates:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;I'm now an Editor on the &lt;a notarget href="http://www.linux.trix.net/" &gt;Linux In Brazil&lt;/a&gt; news
site (see &lt;a href="http://www.advogato.org/person/brain/" &gt;brain&lt;/a&gt;)
&lt;li&gt;Our new internet link, mentioned a earlier, is giving us
a headache. Not as bad as the old one, but almost there.
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.advogato.org/proj/privoxy/" &gt;privoxy&lt;/a&gt; is aproching 
release 3.0
&lt;li&gt;I'm working on a news site engine. Basicaly, for the fun
of it, but I think I'll turn it into a corporate portal
engine, something I have been missing on the open software
market
&lt;/ul&gt;
Thats all for now.&lt;br /&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Tue, 5 Mar 2002 15:07:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>5 Mar 2002</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/morcego/diary.html?start=40</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/morcego/diary.html?start=40</guid>
      <description>Well, one more project to the list: &lt;a href="http://www.advogato.org/proj/ijbswa/" &gt;ijbswa&lt;/a&gt;&lt;BR&gt;
That is simply a Internet Junkbuster (a banner filter,
cookie restrictor, and privacy enhancement software) fork.&lt;BR&gt;
&lt;BR&gt;
Quite a nice software, althoght I recomend using version
2.9.11 (not the stable one), for it supports HTTP/1.1.&lt;BR&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Fri, 8 Feb 2002 01:08:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>8 Feb 2002</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/morcego/diary.html?start=39</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/morcego/diary.html?start=39</guid>
      <description>Well, I&#xB4;m in my father&#xB4;s home. And looks like I arrived just in time.&lt;BR&gt;
As you probably don&#xB4;t know, he is a teacher at a local college (which he hope will soon be upgraded to a
university status). Anyway, he told me that they are redesigning all of the college viewable content (website, 
business cards etc), and asked me if I had something to sugest them. Yeah, right. I just wonder why don&#xB4;t they 
ever learn no to ask me about things like that.&lt;BR&gt;
He just walked out of the computer room with a hudge list of recomendations (including netiquette [rfc1855] rules, 
and links to the &lt;a href="http" ://validator.w3.org/&gt;W3.org validator&lt;/a&gt; and the &lt;a href="http" ://www.anybrowser.org/&gt;Viewable with any browser campaign&lt;/a&gt;). And of course, he promissed me he 
would do his best to make the college adhere to these standards. I&#xB4;m crossing my fingers, but considering the 
level of competence used to design &lt;a href="http" ://www.inatel.br/&gt;current web site&lt;/a&gt;, I&#xB4;m not holding my breath. 
(if you are trying to access it, try with a text browser; it&#xB4;s a once in a lifetime experience :-)).&lt;BR&gt;
Anyway, today we managed to get a city mayor&#xB4;s office to sign with us to change all it&#xB4;s health computer network 
to opensource (linux, more exactly).  Tomorrow, we have a new city to hit. I think maybe I&#xB4;ll preach them about the 
anybrowser campaign ... Then again, maybe thats pushing my luck a little to far. But, maybe not.&lt;BR&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Tue, 5 Feb 2002 18:59:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>5 Feb 2002</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/morcego/diary.html?start=38</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/morcego/diary.html?start=38</guid>
      <description>Well, things are runnig pretty well around here.&lt;BR&gt;
First, our new internet link is up and running. It is a
little slower then our previous one, but it does not crash,
so we are happy with it. Our old one is still in place for
DNS reasons I'm sure you can guess.&lt;BR&gt;
I have started studing to get new certifications. RHCE is
one that comes to my mind. I read an article stating that
most IT personal have 3.something (3&amp;lt;num&amp;lt;4) certifications.
Since I only have 2 (well, actualy, I have 4, but only 2
count as good enough for the IT market), I need to get at
least 2 others pretty quick. I think I'll try RHCE and
BrainBench Network Security (maybe Internet Security too,
but I'm not sure yet).&lt;BR&gt;
</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2002 15:11:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>30 Jan 2002</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/morcego/diary.html?start=37</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/morcego/diary.html?start=37</guid>
      <description>Well, thinks are a real mess around here. I haven't take a
single launch break this week yet. Wow. But at last we are
making things happen.&lt;BR&gt;
As a by product of all this chaos, I haven't been able to
roll out reply-o-matic 1.0 yet. I hope I can do it this
weekend.&lt;BR&gt;
We are changing our backbone provider too. Things should
improve dramaticaly. Take my advice, if you ever have a
proposal from &lt;a href="http" ://www.itc.net.br&gt;ITC&lt;/a&gt;, burn
it, bury the ashes, and salt the ground.&lt;BR&gt;
</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2002 18:45:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>11 Jan 2002</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/morcego/diary.html?start=36</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/morcego/diary.html?start=36</guid>
      <description>Well, the last two days have been very good to
&lt;a href="http://www.advogato.org/proj/reply-o-matic/" &gt;reply-o-matic&lt;/a&gt;. Several new security features,
and version 0.99.0 is now out. 1.0 should be out in one
week.&lt;BR&gt;
&lt;BR&gt;
On the personal side, I'm getting a CD-Writer (finaly!).&lt;BR&gt;
Life is still good :-)&lt;BR&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Wed, 9 Jan 2002 19:59:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>9 Jan 2002</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/morcego/diary.html?start=35</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/morcego/diary.html?start=35</guid>
      <description>Well, as of 2002/01/02, I'm no longer working on Conectiva,
even tho I still do work for them, once I'm now working on
&lt;a href="http" ://www.tisbrasil.com.br/&gt;TIS&lt;/a&gt;, which is a
Conectiva Business Channel.&lt;BR&gt;
I started the project &lt;a
href=/proj/reply-o-matic&gt;Reply-O-Matic&lt;/a&gt;, which is going
quite well and almost ready for version 1.0&lt;BR&gt;
All in all, life is good. I received a good money when
leaving Conectiva, and I didn't even have to change my desk,
once Conectiva branch office in Belo Horizonte used to be on
TIS's office :-)&lt;BR&gt;
One a side note, my Cable company decided to do things right
(finaly). No more filters and no more two-times-a-day
crashes. Lets just hope things continue to improve.&lt;BR&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2001 19:13:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>14 Aug 2001</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/morcego/diary.html?start=34</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/morcego/diary.html?start=34</guid>
      <description>&lt;b&gt;RPM&lt;/b&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
Two new problems on the 4.0.2 branch ... Ouch. Had to make 2
backports from 4.0.3. The frist was okey, once it was
already integrated on the tree. The second was a little
worst, once it will be integrated in the next few days
(which scared the hell outta me, but seens to be working
...)&lt;BR&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;BR&gt;
&lt;B&gt;Conectiva&lt;/b&gt;&lt;BR&gt;
&lt;BR&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
Boy, we are selling. Conectiva Linux 7.0 is breaking all our
records. People is simply loving it. That really gives a
warms felling, you know ... Knowing something you helped
developing is such a huge success.&lt;BR&gt;
On the service front, I just finished a very insteresting
maintance today. Looks like Cyclades PC300 ifup scripts are
bogus. Ouch. Still need to confirm with them that the
problem is not corrected yet, but that looks like the case.
If someone from Cyclades involved on this reads this,
please, drop me an e-mail.&lt;BR&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;BR&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Cable&lt;/b&gt;&lt;BR&gt;
&lt;BR&gt;&lt;ul&gt;
Ouch. Spent most of this morning having up to 98% packet
loss on my cable connection. WTF ?!? Can't this people do
things right ? At least my IPv6 tunnel is working, but I
don't count that as a great winning.&lt;BR&gt;
Oh, btw, I discovered they are not enforcing that link quota
after all. So, I can download/upload as much as I want,
without having to worry about having to pay any extra.&lt;BR&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;BR&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Mon, 6 Aug 2001 16:47:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>6 Aug 2001</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/morcego/diary.html?start=33</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/morcego/diary.html?start=33</guid>
      <description>This was a sleepless weekend.&lt;BR&gt;
Oh buy, CodeRed II is hitting hard. Not that I use Windows,
but it's eating up my bandwidth. And you know what is even
worst ? My cable provider charges me if I use it too much (I
have a 4GB/month quota).&lt;BR&gt;
Of course, I have send a &amp;lt;sarcams&amp;gt;nice
little&amp;lt;/sarcasm&amp;gt; letter to my cable provider, but
don't know if it will help.&lt;BR&gt;
Anyway, CodeRed II is a pain, no matter if you use Windows
(in which case, you already have lots of other problems) or
not. I'm getting 10+ hits an hour only from my cable modem
provider backbone (80/tcp is blocked from the outside). I
can only imagine what other people without these filters are
getting hit by. And no, I'm not defending this kind of
filters. They suck...&lt;BR&gt;
Current statistics for the last 40 hours: 195 hits from 39
unique IPs (with the hit rate rising pretty fast)&lt;BR&gt;
&lt;BR&gt;
Actualy, I'm getting pretty sick of my cable provider (which
is &lt;a href="http" ://www.virtua.com.br/&gt;Virtua&lt;/a&gt;, if any of
you want to know). They pretty much stinks. Filters all
around, transfer quotas, high prices, slow. Not considering,
of course, that they take at least a full week to answer any
e-mail you send them, and that their support phone line only
works from 6am to midnight.&lt;BR&gt;
The problem is that I don't have any other choice. ADSL here
is if anything worst (you have to access one specifig
homepage before being allowed to use it), and even more
pricy. I'm simply are lost here. It's a plain abuse to
charge something like US$35/month for a 128K connection,
where you can get (with luck) transfer rates like 10Kbps
(the average is little better then 5Kbps).&lt;BR&gt;
Well, thats enough ranting for today.&lt;BR&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
