<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Advogato blog for mazeone</title>
    <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/mazeone/</link>
    <description>Advogato blog for mazeone</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <generator>mod_virgule</generator>
    <pubDate>Wed, 8 Oct 2008 01:10:54 GMT</pubDate>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Wed, 7 Feb 2001 20:12:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>7 Feb 2001</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/mazeone/diary.html?start=70</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/mazeone/diary.html?start=70</guid>
      <description>nekkid chocolate pics (just for richlowe).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Mon, 8 Jan 2001 02:30:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>8 Jan 2001</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/mazeone/diary.html?start=69</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/mazeone/diary.html?start=69</guid>
      <description>&lt;B&gt;KDE&lt;/b&gt;&lt;BR&gt;
I've discovered the two things that make &lt;A
HREF="http://www.kde.org"&gt;konqueror&lt;/a&gt; really annoying.
&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;you can't paste a link into the main window to go
there (works in NS4/mozilla)
&lt;LI&gt;The CSS support is just as buggy as NS4, which means it
is horrid.&lt;/ol&gt;
Number 1 is annoying but not a crisis.  Number 2 pisses me
off a lot.  I tried to fix my &lt;A
HREF="http://mazeone.dcaa.net/bashism.html"&gt;bash page&lt;/a&gt; so
it would look correct in NS4/konqueror but decided that it
wasn't worth working around their css bugs...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2000 21:38:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>20 Dec 2000</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/mazeone/diary.html?start=68</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/mazeone/diary.html?start=68</guid>
      <description>&lt;b&gt;Code&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Helped Chutt track down the CD audio bug in &lt;A
HREF="http://www.freeamp.org"&gt;FreeAmp&lt;/a&gt; the other day.  He
still hasn't committed it to the CVS tree because his local
tree is b0rked, but it at least works on my machine...&lt;BR&gt;
Moved over to using &lt;A
HREF="http://enlightenment.org"&gt;enlightenment&lt;/a&gt; V0.17 full
time at home yesterday.  It doesn't have enough features yet
for me to use it at work, but for home use it does fine. 
I'm using gnome panel, since there aren't any root menus
yet--it appears that the gnome menu in panel has become full
of evil suck.  At least in the .deb, there are a bunch of
stupid application catagories that you can't edit from the
menu editor, the only thing you can change is stuff under
your "Favorites" menu.  And why does each sub menu have a
heading that gives you the name of the menu again in what
looks like another menu item that isn't selectable?  Since I
just selected the Favorites selection on my menu, don't I
probably *KNOW* what that menu is?  Also, I found it
annoying that if I had a 'sliding' panel and used the little
arrow buttons to move it to the far right of the screen and
then dragged it somewhere else, it would jump back to the
right hand side whenever I added anything to it.  After
spending years defending gnome in #e, I find that I can't
really stand using it anymore.  Oh well...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;
&lt;B&gt;Me&lt;/b&gt;&lt;BR&gt;
My favorite place to eat in Georgetown, Burrito Brothers, is
closing tomorrow.  &lt;i&gt;sigh&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;B&gt;Addendum&lt;/b&gt;&lt;BR&gt;
it seems that after quite awhile of stability, &lt;A
HREF="http://mozilla.org"&gt;mozilla&lt;/a&gt; has had some problems
over the last several weeks.  I've had it crash more over
the last couple of weeks then in the 2 months previous, I
think.  There have also been weird problems with dialogs,
and it seems to have eaten this diary entry, twice.  Ah
well, hopefully they are doing cool stuff and that's what's
breaking...&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;
</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2000 19:09:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>27 Nov 2000</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/mazeone/diary.html?start=67</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/mazeone/diary.html?start=67</guid>
      <description>I love free software.  The people at work finally convinced
me that I should have some instant messaging client setup
(primarily by never answering their phones).  I tried TiK
but it was just too, "tk-ish" for me to be able to stand.  I
looked at gaim and it was OK...except all the stupid
braindead buttons all over the "conversation" window.  It
seems that just because AOL makes their client unbearably
ugly, everyone who writes an IM client has to do the same.
So I checked the src deb out, poked around in
conversation.c, and soon had a client that just shows a
textbox at the top for conversation and a single textbox for
input at the bottom.  No buttons, no ugly border, just
simple goodness :)  Of course, without the source I would
have been screwed--&amp;gt; no wonder 99% of the windows software
in the world sucks.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2000 21:55:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>20 Nov 2000</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/mazeone/diary.html?start=66</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/mazeone/diary.html?start=66</guid>
      <description>finished the new &lt;A
HREF="http://mazeone.dcaa.net"&gt;webpage&lt;/a&gt; this weekend.
The whole site is created by running a script (cunningly
named "makepage.pl") that goes through and makes the page
from a couple of templates and a bunch of content files.  It
creates thumbnails from the screenshots and pix directories,
creates indexes, blah blah blah.  Of course, the resulting
page is
hard to read in a few places (i need to make the colors
contrast more) and clean up the html output more.  and make
an admin interface so i can add news items and screenshots
without ssh'ing to the webserver and editing files...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2000 17:25:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>16 Nov 2000</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/mazeone/diary.html?start=65</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/mazeone/diary.html?start=65</guid>
      <description>&lt;a href="http://www.advogato.org/person/iain/" &gt;iain&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
I'm sorry if the people in #e were mean to you, as there is
a chance that I was one of those people.  The only excuse we
have is that there is a constant barrage of really stupid
people coming in the channel, bugging us with the same
stupid questions over and over.  So when someone who isn't
stupid asks the same question, there is a chance that they
will take the brunt of the frustration caused by the other
people.  Luckily, it appears that a good number of the
people who used to bug us have moved on to using sawfish, so
people in #e have a bit more patience than they used to.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;B&gt;efm&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
The plan all along was for efm to become part of the next
version of enlightenment.  Raster and Mandrake built what
was EFM as a test of a lot of their ideas on what should go
into a file manager.  Now they are going back and building
core libraries, including a lot of the ideas that were
sucessful in what was EFM.  They don't want to get a lot of
support questions about EFM (which has never been actually
released), so they moved it off the CVS server.  #e also
isn't interested in supporting it, much to the dismay of a
lot of people who have seen the nice screenshots, which is
why usually people in #e disavow all knowledge...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
I have sometimes wondered if #e is "not nice", compared to
other large irc channels...I know that the other large
channels I've seen (#perl, #gnome) tend to be as brutal as
#e, if not worse.  </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2000 18:01:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>10 Nov 2000</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/mazeone/diary.html?start=64</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/mazeone/diary.html?start=64</guid>
      <description>hmmm&lt;br&gt;
I decided to rewrite my webpage, and this time to create
scripts that will create all the html from a template file
and some .content files.  The basics work great.  However,
now I'm considering how to handle "special case" pages, like
my screenshots page nad my random pictures page.  On those
pages I want to take a dir of images with one file that
contains captions and automagically create an index page
containing thumbnails that link to pages with the actual
pictures (or the image files themselves, in the screenshot
page).  Right now, my main script looks for all the .content
files in the main dir and creates .html files from those.  I
also have a couple of scripts that will create the "special"
pages on their own.  I'm trying to see if I can come up with
a way of having one script do it all for me, and whether
that will just be nasty (do i have a .pages file that tells
my script which pages are "special"....&lt;br&gt;
I know that there are 10,000 packages out there that will do
exactly what I'm doing now for me much more elegantly and
better than anything I can write, but writing this crap is
helping me with the depression I've been struggling with for
the last several days.  &lt;i&gt;sigh&lt;/i&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;
&lt;b&gt;update&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
I of course realized that i was being an idiot.  All I have
to do is create the custom .content files seperately, and
then my script can create the html from those.  So the main
body of my script looks like:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
#!/usr/bin/perl&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;

&lt;p&gt; &amp;amp;make_pixcontent;&lt;br&gt;
&amp;amp;make_sscontent;&lt;br&gt;
&amp;amp;make_html;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt; inside the make_pixcontent and make_sscontent subs I create
a .content page that, when parsed, creates an index page of
all the images thumbnailed, and then a bunch of .content
files that parse to have the full sized image on the page.
Whee!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Wed, 1 Nov 2000 19:31:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>1 Nov 2000</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/mazeone/diary.html?start=63</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/mazeone/diary.html?start=63</guid>
      <description>&lt;a href="http://www.advogato.org/person/neuro/" &gt;neuro&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
if visibility is bad, maybe you shouldn't have been going
that fast?  I used to drive a school bus and I have no
patience for people who try to make excuses for running red
lights or doing other stupid things on the road.  </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2000 18:35:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>30 Oct 2000</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/mazeone/diary.html?start=62</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/mazeone/diary.html?start=62</guid>
      <description>&lt;a href="http://www.advogato.org/person/lilo/" &gt;lilo&lt;/a&gt; is funny looking.  And he smells
weird.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
/me hides ;)</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Wed, 4 Oct 2000 18:21:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>4 Oct 2000</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/mazeone/diary.html?start=61</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/mazeone/diary.html?start=61</guid>
      <description>&lt;b&gt;code&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
I've actually been doing some coding.  I sent in a patch to
&lt;a href="http://www.freeamp.org" &gt;freeamp&lt;/a&gt; last night,
probably won't make it in until after 2.1 comes out.  I also
did some nasty hackery on vorbiscomment to make it take
command line arguments, and then wrote a perl wrapper around
it  so it would clean up my broken metadata on a few of my
ripped CDs.  My changes were so bad there is no way I'd ever
send them upstream, tho.  It does make me love open source
:)&lt;br&gt;
Today I pulled all the ftp/scp stuff out of webcam (sorry,
no URL) so it'll just take a single snapshot and archive
it.  I then wrote a perl wrapper to that to upload it to my
&lt;a href="http://mazeone.dcaa.net" &gt;website&lt;/a&gt;.  Oh yeah, i
also updated my website a little.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;b&gt;!code&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
I read that signal11 vs. cmdrtaco log.  to me it seemed that
cmdrtaco was very reasonable all the way through it.   I
dunno, I think that people take stuff &lt;b&gt;way&lt;/b&gt; too
seriously.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
