<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Advogato blog for jaldhar</title>
    <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/jaldhar/</link>
    <description>Advogato blog for jaldhar</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <generator>mod_virgule</generator>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 08:51:22 GMT</pubDate>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2004 05:18:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>16 Jul 2004</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/jaldhar/diary.html?start=19</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/jaldhar/diary.html?start=19</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Not Just More Information, We Need Consolidation Of Information&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So I came home from Connecticut and opened up debian-devel for the
first time in four days to find a General Resolution had been proposed
to get the amd64 port into the archive and a huge flamewar has resulted. 
The amd64 porters feel they are being blocked by ftpmaster intransigence
and lack of communication.  Other people are sickened that Debian, which
has always prided itself on doing the right thing not necessarily the
popular thing, is now using voting as a means of coercion and the
ftpmasters are unfairly being hassled.  Who is is the real victim?
&lt;p&gt;I'll tell you who the victim is, it's &lt;strong&gt;ME!&lt;/strong&gt; Why am I
forced to have to sift through large piles of crap, just to keep abreast
of what's going ?  Just kill the threads you aren't interested in I hear
some people say.  The problem is threads drift.  Occasionally, there is
some useful and important bit of information amongst the drivel. 
(Again, remember ajs' social contract bombshell?  Delivered during a
massive and unrelated tread on debian-vote.)  I am subscribed to 18
mailing lists and hang out on IRC a couple of times a week and I still
don't know exactly what the deal is with things like the amd64 port. 
This is a major development one should know about don't you think?  If I
could devote my life to the project as some people seem to be able to it
wouldn't be a problem but I can't do that.  God, family, rent, Debian
has to take a back seat to all of these nowadays.  I don't like this
situation.  Working on Debian has been both pleasurable and brought me
material benefits but something will soon have to give.  Of course I
could just follow the lead of atleast 50% of the developers (according
to recent voting patterns) and just live on the little island of my own
packages not paying any attention to what goes on within the project. 
But doesn't such a view make a mockery of our ideals of openness and
collaboration?
&lt;p&gt;Manoj says we should have a little sympathy and respect for the
people behind the titles.  This is sage advice and I agree.  But how
about if those people showed a little sympathy for us?  I'm sure writing
status reports is a boring waste of time but think of how much time is
wasted by other people when they &lt;em&gt;aren't&lt;/em&gt; written.  For a great
example of something I wan't to see more of, read &lt;a
href="http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2004/07/msg00904.html"
class="autoformat"&gt;Roger Leighs' report about the LSM Free Software
Printing Summit&lt;/a&gt;. (The only criticism is that it should have been
posted to debian-devel-announce.) Frankly if people in key positions
can't do something like that once a month, they are a hindrance and
should step aside or be replaced.  Debian is not a little club anymore. 
The amount of communication which was adequate in those days is not
adequate anymore.
</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2004 15:50:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>29 Apr 2004</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/jaldhar/diary.html?start=18</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/jaldhar/diary.html?start=18</guid>
      <description>&lt;div style="background-image: url(http://www.braincells.com/debian/images/iamdebian.png); width:80px; height:32px"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2004 02:55:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>28 Apr 2004</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/jaldhar/diary.html?start=17</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/jaldhar/diary.html?start=17</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Mountains and Molehills&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bah I say!  Bah!  A vote on the document that defines the very foundation
of Debian philosophy is met with resounding apathy.  Amongst the ones
who did vote some are saying &amp;quot;But we didn't know we were voting for
_this_.&amp;quot;  (Come to Jersey City.  The local Democratic party machine
loves people like you.)  And then aj has to go and posit a totally far
out interpretation of the (modest--I actually read them) changes to the
social contract that might require us to delay the release of sarge
until next year.
&lt;p&gt;The new wording in the social contract says &amp;quot;We promise the Debian
system and all its components &lt;em&gt;will&lt;/em&gt; be free.&amp;quot;  This indicates an ideal
state which hasn't been reached but we are working towards.  We have not
lost any honor or credibility etc. by saying &amp;quot;Yes this stuff is
important but right now we're doing a release.  We promise we'll get to
it ASAP post-sarge.&amp;quot;  All the GR did was make the language explicit. 
There is no new sentiment expressed in the social contract which wasn't
there before.  So if we could weasel out of postponing (not ignoring)
the GFDL issue for example then, there is no reason why we couldn't do
that now.  In fact I bet you we will find a way.  &lt;strong&gt;[update: Steve
Langasek is doing just that.]&lt;/strong&gt; So apart from general confusion 
and consternation amongst people who are unfamiliar with Debian and some
unnecessary wear and tear on my 'd' key, what did all this brouhaha
actually acheive?
&lt;p&gt;-- Disgusted, Tonbridge Wells.
</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2004 17:16:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>27 Apr 2004</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/jaldhar/diary.html?start=16</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/jaldhar/diary.html?start=16</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Dovecot 1.0 test1 .debs&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Now that Timo has released an alpha version of the
&lt;a href="http://dovecot.procontrol.fi/" &gt;Dovecot mail 
server&lt;/a&gt; I have prepared .debs and put them on 
&lt;a href="http://src.braincells.com/dovecot-test/" &gt;src.braincells.com&lt;/a&gt;.  
Given Timos' caveats about the raw nature of the code (e.g. mbox doesn't work, 
recent flags are broken,) these packages are deliberatly non-aptable.  
You need to download them and manually install them with dpkg -i.  Do 
not use them if you are at all worried about potentially losing 
mail.
</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2004 21:24:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>21 Apr 2004</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/jaldhar/diary.html?start=15</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/jaldhar/diary.html?start=15</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;My Article In Linuxworld Magazine&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I wrote an article about Debian which will appear in the May issue of 
&lt;a href="http://www.linuxworld.com" &gt;Linuxworld Magazine&lt;/a&gt;.  The print version 
isn't out yet but there is a .PDF you can download 
&lt;a href="http://www.linuxworld.com/magazine/linuxworld_vol2issue5.pdf" &gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.  
The article for some strange reason is not in the table of contents, you 
can find it on pages 44-47.
&lt;p&gt;If you've seen my &lt;a href="http://debianintro.alioth.debian.org/" &gt;
&amp;quot;Introducing Debian GNU/Linux&amp;quot; flyer&lt;/a&gt;, then you'll recognize most 
of the contents of this article as I basically took that and added some more 
hyperbole and a goofy headshot.
</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2004 04:38:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>21 Feb 2004</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/jaldhar/diary.html?start=14</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/jaldhar/diary.html?start=14</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Shivaratri and Debian-IN&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Wednesday night was Mahashivaratri.  There was a record crowd at our 
mandir which meant long delays in getting darshan.  I spent the night 
praying (and drank bhang) so I was totally out of commission on 
Thursday.  Today I'm mostly recovered though.
&lt;p&gt;Speaking of Indian matters, it looks like Debian-IN is finally 
getting off the ground.  I now have a couple of volunteers and the first 
packages should be along soon.
</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2004 00:47:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>13 Feb 2004</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/jaldhar/diary.html?start=13</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/jaldhar/diary.html?start=13</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Shailaja Learns A New Word&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Today my daughter (now 27 months old) turned to my wife, pointed to my 
laptop and said "Jyo mummy, Debian chhe." ("Look Mummy it's Debian.")  
Is being potty-trained a prerequisite for the new maintainer process?
</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Mon, 9 Feb 2004 05:41:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>9 Feb 2004</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/jaldhar/diary.html?start=12</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/jaldhar/diary.html?start=12</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;A Community Replacement for Linuxworld?&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Today (well, yesterday by now) I attended a meeting on Debians'
behalf of several New York-area free software groups.  The meetings
agenda was to try and begin to organize a replacement for Linuxworld
which as of next year is moving to Boston.  Committees were formed to
work on various tasks.  Yours truly is doing the vital task of
name/logo/mission statement brainstorming.  More news as it happens.
</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Mon, 9 Feb 2004 01:16:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>9 Feb 2004</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/jaldhar/diary.html?start=11</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/jaldhar/diary.html?start=11</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Using Filenames With '*' In Them In Makefiles&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While packaging the latest webmin version I had an interesting time
trying to figure out how to do stuff to files with names like
config-*-linux.  The trouble is '*' gets interpreted as a wildcard
character.  Normally in bash on the commandline to get a literal '*' you
would just do this: config-\*-linux.  But in a makefile, it gets
converted to config-\\*-linux.  Increasing the number of slashes was
suggested but to no avail.  The correct answer is $$'config-*-linux'
(You have to use two dollar signs so it doesn't get interpreted as a
make variable.)</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Mon, 2 Feb 2004 02:18:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>2 Feb 2004</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/jaldhar/diary.html?start=10</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/jaldhar/diary.html?start=10</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Wave Your Freak Flag High!&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Februarys' &lt;a href="http://www.linuxjournal.com" &gt;Linux Journal&lt;/a&gt; has an article by Doc 
Searls (the man of bronze?) called &amp;quot;DIY-IT: How Linux And Open Source 
Are Bringing Do-It-Yourself to Information Technology&amp;quot; which includes 
the following quote:
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&amp;quot;I'm&amp;nbsp;seeing&amp;nbsp;far&amp;nbsp;more&amp;nbsp;Debian&amp;nbsp;than&amp;nbsp;any&amp;nbsp;report&amp;nbsp;gives&amp;nbsp;it&amp;nbsp;credit&amp;nbsp;for&amp;quot;,&amp;nbsp;&lt;br/&gt;
says&amp;nbsp;one&amp;nbsp;technologist&amp;nbsp;working&amp;nbsp;for&amp;nbsp;a&amp;nbsp;large&amp;nbsp;vendor&amp;nbsp;that&amp;nbsp;has&amp;nbsp;partnerships&amp;nbsp;&lt;br/&gt;
with&amp;nbsp;Red&amp;nbsp;Hat&amp;nbsp;and&amp;nbsp;SuSE.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;quot;Red&amp;nbsp;Hat&amp;nbsp;and&amp;nbsp;SuSE&amp;nbsp;may&amp;nbsp;sell&amp;nbsp;more,&amp;nbsp;so&amp;nbsp;they&amp;nbsp;show&amp;nbsp;&lt;br/&gt;
up&amp;nbsp;on&amp;nbsp;surveys&amp;nbsp;that&amp;nbsp;follow&amp;nbsp;sales.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;But&amp;nbsp;in&amp;nbsp;terms&amp;nbsp;of&amp;nbsp;implementation,&amp;nbsp;Debian&amp;nbsp;&lt;br/&gt;
is&amp;nbsp;pretty&amp;nbsp;big.&amp;quot;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So all you stealth Debian users, stand up and be counted!</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
