<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0.">
  <channel>
    <title>Advogato blog for gilbou</title>
    <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/gilbou/</link>
    <description>Advogato blog for gilbou</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <generator>mod_virgule</generator>
    <pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 17:21:26 GMT</pubDate>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:55:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>11 Mar 2008</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/gilbou/diary.html?start=174</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/gilbou/diary.html?start=174</guid>
      <description>&lt;tt&gt;been watching the &lt;a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/03/09/crowd-totally-hates-on-mark-zuckerbergs-interviewer-at-sxsw/" &gt;sarah&#xD;
lacy disaster&lt;/a&gt;. she should get fired. how can someone so&#xD;
incompetent and selfish claim herself to be a journalist...&#xD;
i have never ever seen an interview with someone behave so &#xD;
unprofesionally, talking of herself and always making closed&#xD;
questions. the facebook guy even told her : "perhaps it&#xD;
would get more interesting if you would ask.. some&#xD;
questions" (!!) she clearly wanted it to be all about her&#xD;
and she later even told the public to "screw" itself. this&#xD;
my friends is having yourself revealed to the world for what&#xD;
you really are.&lt;p&gt;she kept interrupting the guy all the time&#xD;
(the crowd started to talk about it and they could not&#xD;
believe it). she asked no interesting question, none. she&#xD;
kept making some bold statements, talking to the crowd in&#xD;
what i have to call a vulgar way. &lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;worst interview&#xD;
ever.&lt;/b&gt;&#xD;
just &lt;a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/10/mark-zuckerberg-sarah-lacy-interview-from-sxsw/" &gt;watch&#xD;
the mess&lt;/a&gt; and judge by&#xD;
yourself.&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.advogato.org/person/lucasr/" &gt;lucasr&lt;/a&gt; : check joshua redman's&#xD;
albums. i started jazz with those. love it.&lt;/tt&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Wed, 5 Mar 2008 19:16:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>5 Mar 2008</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/gilbou/diary.html?start=173</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/gilbou/diary.html?start=173</guid>
      <description>&lt;tt&gt;&lt;p&gt;got a new video card, a nvidia &lt;a href="http://www.nvidia.com/object/geforce_8600.html" &gt;8600&#xD;
gt&lt;/a&gt;. the overclocked model from club3d (it's in sweden i&#xD;
think). it's not really to get a better world of warcraft&#xD;
from linux (works like a charm by the way, on debian etch&#xD;
4.0 32 bits + cedega 6.0.5). i had a 7900 gt previously and&#xD;
could not try to play with &lt;a href="http://www.nvidia.com/object/cuda_home.html" &gt;Cuda&lt;/a&gt;.&#xD;
at work (&lt;a href="http://www.math.univ-paris13.fr/laga/" &gt;cnrs&lt;/a&gt;) we&#xD;
got a cluster. and its admin bought two &lt;a href="http://www.nvidia.com/object/tesla_gpu_processor.html" &gt;tesla&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;
cards from nvidia which are dedicated to mathematics (128&#xD;
threads par cpu, two per card). the good thing about it and&#xD;
compared to the ati solution (this is gonna change very soon&#xD;
i think under's amd guidance) is we use nvcc which are&#xD;
wrappers (not very clean if you dive your nose in) around&#xD;
gcc. it's moving fast. first, each card offers us 500 Gflops&#xD;
so we have a theorical 1 Tflop with just two cards loaded on&#xD;
two machines. it's not very portable and you really need to&#xD;
know the architecture behind it to have it work properly.&#xD;
the first week we got the cards was funny. once the card was&#xD;
plugged the machine was not even booting. it only worked on&#xD;
a very very few specific dell machines. after a nvidia&#xD;
developer gave us some daily code, it finally worked. well&#xD;
the machine was booting but once the nvidia's cuda driver&#xD;
was installed it did not see the card.  it took over two&#xD;
weeks to have the cards available from debian on the cluster&#xD;
;) and of course all pre-packaged stuff is only for redhat,&#xD;
suse.. well. i am a bsd monk so i really dont like linux.&#xD;
but god i do love debian (i never thought i would ever say&#xD;
that). the nice thing about the whole thing is you buy a&#xD;
cheap video card, and you can from linux write cuda code.&#xD;
then, we just move that code to the cluster where the tesla&#xD;
cards run it with their raw computing power. that's cool to&#xD;
be able to compile and run it on small scales and then just&#xD;
load it on the cluster for full range calculations. the only&#xD;
thing that really annoys me if that most Cuda functions are&#xD;
UPPERCASE like this and i got a happy hacking keyboard&#xD;
without capslock key... :/&lt;p&gt;well tonight i'm going to&#xD;
install and try at home for the first time to use cuda on my&#xD;
8600 and i'd like to implement something easy like a md5&#xD;
hash or so. and then upload it to the cluster but it's not&#xD;
really something you can get scalar execution from (well,&#xD;
it's a stream you work upon so it's gonna be disk-bound in&#xD;
performance).&lt;p&gt;another problem are mathematicians. most of&#xD;
them if not all know how to use matlab or libraries to their&#xD;
fields of work (petsc, and so on) and for cuda to really&#xD;
work it has to be as transparent as possible. most know how&#xD;
to write C code, but we're not really seeing them wanna&#xD;
learn the inners of those tesla cards to get real fast,&#xD;
optimized scalar code to run on those gpus. we need either&#xD;
fortran libraries that use as much cuda as possible or to&#xD;
have as much as possible matlab functions to be redirected&#xD;
to the gpu through some addon/lib for matlab. most of our&#xD;
mathematicians do code, but their work is mathematics. not&#xD;
spending days the nose deep in C with the tesla architeture&#xD;
in mind for best performance. hope nvidia will improve this&#xD;
on those parts :)&lt;/tt&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Tue, 5 Feb 2008 23:53:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>5 Feb 2008</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/gilbou/diary.html?start=172</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/gilbou/diary.html?start=172</guid>
      <description>&lt;tt&gt;im pissed off. really. i got an ibm thinkpad x30. works&#xD;
fine under netbsd. i can put a YEARS old netbsd or openbsd&#xD;
or whatever on this machine, and everything works. since&#xD;
last week i have tried on this machine : debian 4.0 etch,&#xD;
lenny and i just finished install of unstable. no network.&#xD;
nothing. the ethernet plug is there, lighted, and dhclient&#xD;
fails and never gets any answer. wifi doesnt work either.&#xD;
how can a netbsd years old have everything to work from this&#xD;
piece of crap, and the latest 2.6.22-3 kernel and debian&#xD;
unstable cant even get a fscking dhclient to work ? it's the&#xD;
third time i try to install debian on this machine and it&#xD;
either gets stuck on the login screen of gnome because the&#xD;
orinoco drivers gets nuts (debian lenny, debian etch) or the&#xD;
eth1 gets no answer from the dhcp, while another box on etch&#xD;
4.0 much more recent (asus n2m32 sli...) works fine. i&#xD;
really hate, hate this. i cant believe this crap recent&#xD;
kernel is unable to have this machine work on default&#xD;
install. been searching for over an hour with google,&#xD;
there's nothing about the thinkpad x30 having problems with&#xD;
debian anywhere. ethernet is intel 82801CAM (ICH3) PRO/100&#xD;
VE (LOM) (rev 42). this is why i hate linux, and love debian&#xD;
at the same time. debian is wonderful at work, we just put&#xD;
it everywhere. but this piece of crap keeps burning me when&#xD;
any several years old or the latest snapshot of any bsd just&#xD;
works fine with no config, no kernel compilation out of the&#xD;
box. and for the third time tomorrow i guess i will have no&#xD;
choice but to remove debian and get back to bsd. i feel like&#xD;
killing penguins at close range with great violence and&#xD;
blood everywhere.&lt;/tt&gt;&#xD;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;tt&gt;searching again and again i found people with the&#xD;
same problem&lt;br&gt;&#xD;
http://ubuntuforums.org/archive/index.php/t-182618.html&lt;br&gt;&#xD;
http://www.webservertalk.com/archive99-2007-6-1910758.html&lt;/tt&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Tue, 5 Feb 2008 14:29:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>5 Feb 2008</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/gilbou/diary.html?start=171</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/gilbou/diary.html?start=171</guid>
      <description>&lt;tt&gt;installed under debian unstable a xps from dell, model&#xD;
m1730. freaky machine. it runs a dual core from intel, and&#xD;
is loaded with two nvidia 8700M GT video cards with SLI link&#xD;
and.. a PhysX card. my god. after a 2.6.22 kernel install, I&#xD;
added the kernel headers and installed the nvidia 169.09&#xD;
drivers. what is strange is on the day before, I did the&#xD;
same driver install on a very same debian unstable snapshot,&#xD;
and two scripts located in /etc/init.d, namely nvidia-kernel&#xD;
and nvidia-glx, were screwing the driver on each reboot. I&#xD;
had to rm those two files to keep the 169.09 working on the&#xD;
dell laptop (a d630). on the xps, after the kernel module&#xD;
compilation and install, opengl 32 bits install, those two&#xD;
scripts were not present in /etc/init.d. if you are&#xD;
installing the nvidia drivers and they break on reboot, rm&#xD;
the nvidia-* scripts from /etc/init.d ;)&lt;p&gt;having the SLI to&#xD;
work was very easy. edited the xorg.conf and forced the&#xD;
MultiGPU option to yes and selected AFR (alternate frame&#xD;
rendering) as method rather than Auto because in this mode&#xD;
the SLI/Dual GPU rendering will only work if the application&#xD;
being run is recognized.&lt;p&gt;been installing OCS and&#xD;
Munin-client on every box on the network at the CNRS here&#xD;
and it's a pretty good stuff. Problem is the load on the&#xD;
processor on the server side goes up for each machine we had&#xD;
to Munin... and it goes up a little too fast 8)&lt;/tt&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 00:43:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>26 Jan 2008</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/gilbou/diary.html?start=170</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/gilbou/diary.html?start=170</guid>
      <description>&lt;tt&gt;up to now i used cedega from debian. worked ok but i&#xD;
wanted to check another distro. so i downloaded a fedora&#xD;
core 8 because it has a dvd so i could avoid downloading&#xD;
most packages to install (you have such considerations when&#xD;
you only have a slow 1 mbit link). what a piece of crap. i&#xD;
install it, then the update says there's updates to do. and&#xD;
of course, it fails. it first crashes and asks me to report&#xD;
a bug, then does not crash but is unable to resolve&#xD;
dependencies, then it seems to work but asks me a cdrom that&#xD;
does not exist. i installed from dvd and it asks me for cd&#xD;
number 1. i insert the install dvd, and it refuses to use&#xD;
it. what the fuck ? so they currently distribute an&#xD;
operating system install media which if you install in the&#xD;
default setting without touching anything, is unable to&#xD;
update, does not even recognize its install media and asks&#xD;
for a disk you dont have. yeah, sure. well after 30 min&#xD;
install and 10 minutes of crashes, error and stupid way of&#xD;
working, i got rid of that crap. im gonna put the debian&#xD;
back where it was, and aptitude update/upgrade and basta.&lt;/tt&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 16:09:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>28 Dec 2007</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/gilbou/diary.html?start=169</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/gilbou/diary.html?start=169</guid>
      <description>&lt;tt&gt;gnupg ftp seems down. i found some mirrors, downloaded&#xD;
two versions of gnupg-1.4.8.tar.gz but none do check the md5&#xD;
sum as reported on gnupg.org. been forced to go back to a&#xD;
verified version of gnupg-1.4.6.tar.gz i keep at home. be&#xD;
cautious if you download or compile gnupg : check the md5&#xD;
sum and sha1 sum and be prudent. could be just some problem&#xD;
but having the main ftp down and downloading files that pass&#xD;
gzip -t but fail on hashes.. fishy ?&lt;/tt&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 23:19:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>18 Dec 2007</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/gilbou/diary.html?start=168</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/gilbou/diary.html?start=168</guid>
      <description>&lt;tt&gt;spent most of the day reworking my console and screen&#xD;
settings. wandered inside netbsd 4,0_rc5 and found with joy&#xD;
sendmail seems really gone for postfix by default (at last&#xD;
that sendmail crap is gone). checked the zsh but still&#xD;
keeping my pdksh (i dont even recall why i love so much the&#xD;
korn shell, but there was some good reason i seem to have&#xD;
forgot). wondering how to add to sftp or scp a stdin &amp;gt; file&#xD;
thru ssh connection (aim is to dd something, have it piped&#xD;
to scp/sftp in batch mode without interaction and have the&#xD;
file being dropped on another box). probably going to end&#xD;
with a nfs exported thru ssh tunnel and dd dump from&#xD;
disk/part to some file inside this nfs :/ mm and if you have&#xD;
netbsd and a pc with suspend to ram you can help: &lt;b&gt;testers&#xD;
are required to test the new acpi code for suspend to ram on&#xD;
netbsd..&lt;/b&gt; check mailing-lists about it. christmas is coming&#xD;
and i already know i will have (1) no vacations and (2) be&#xD;
doing a full audit at work before i got to write doc, create&#xD;
a db to dump audit data and dmesg (already spent one full&#xD;
day working on a bootable cd that boots and dumps a file&#xD;
with first ethernet's mac as filename with dmesg inside with&#xD;
a combo of boot-cd that dumps dmesg to floppy which stores&#xD;
while i'll go from box to box). at least i should be alone&#xD;
at work with none of those pesky humans around me, precious&#xD;
server cpu cycle leechers. and it's cold, i get to work by&#xD;
bike and need over one hour just to be able to type anything&#xD;
properly. sucks.&lt;/tt&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 20:58:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>10 Dec 2007</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/gilbou/diary.html?start=167</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/gilbou/diary.html?start=167</guid>
      <description>&lt;tt&gt;spent part of the day trying to get freebsd to install&#xD;
on a thinkpad x31. we did use pxe to boot the x31 from a&#xD;
netbsd loaded x30. pxe boot is ok thru tftp and dhcpd, but&#xD;
the x31 did freeze all the time. on freebsd 6.2 we had to&#xD;
remove all /tftpd/kernel/acpi* and it would grab the kernel&#xD;
and mfsroot and freeze at random after keyboard selection or&#xD;
alike. searching online showed a freebsd trouble with x31&#xD;
related to either acpi and, very probably, the ata1 and the&#xD;
dock (docked x31 dont freeze). so we downloaded freebsd-7 to&#xD;
try it from the ftp, dumped its cd's boot/ to /tftpd but it&#xD;
would not even boot.. we tried to remove the acpi stuff the&#xD;
hard way (by removing the freebsd's kernel acpi*.ko files)&#xD;
but also by tweaking the load_acpi=NO and the&#xD;
hint.acpi.0.disabled=1 (since we pxeboot the laptop and have&#xD;
it load mfsroot+kernel at /tftpd/kernel/kernel we dont get&#xD;
the usual cdrom install menu that offers a non-acpi kernel).&#xD;
neither freebsd 6.2 nor the 7 we got from the ftp did work..&#xD;
no fun.&lt;/tt&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 11:26:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>17 Nov 2007</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/gilbou/diary.html?start=166</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/gilbou/diary.html?start=166</guid>
      <description>&lt;tt&gt;it's been a long time since i posted anything. well.&#xD;
left club internet. discovered the gsxr 750. still happy&#xD;
with netbsd and checking openbsd from time to time ;)&lt;/tt&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 17:26:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>10 Oct 2006</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/gilbou/diary.html?start=165</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/gilbou/diary.html?start=165</guid>
      <description>&lt;tt&gt;&#xD;
today i tried a new firefox extension that lets you do whois&#xD;
from any web page. you just click it and it appears.&lt;br&gt;&#xD;
so while i was on google.com home page i clicked the link&#xD;
and obviously something wrong appears :&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;
GOOGLE.COM.ZOMBIED.AND.HACKED.BY.WWW.WEB-HACK.COM&lt;br&gt;&#xD;
GOOGLE.COM.VN&lt;br&gt;&#xD;
GOOGLE.COM.UA&lt;br&gt;&#xD;
GOOGLE.COM.SUCKS.FIND.CRACKZ.WITH.SEARCH.GULLI.COM&lt;br&gt;&#xD;
GOOGLE.COM.PLZ.GIVE.A.PR8.TO.AUDIOTRACKER.NET&lt;br&gt;&#xD;
GOOGLE.COM.MX&lt;br&gt;&#xD;
GOOGLE.COM.IS.POWERED.BY.MIKLEFEDOROV.COM&lt;br&gt;&#xD;
GOOGLE.COM.IS.NOT.HOSTED.BY.ACTIVEDOMAINDNS.NET&lt;br&gt;&#xD;
GOOGLE.COM.IS.APPROVED.BY.NUMEA.COM&lt;br&gt;&#xD;
GOOGLE.COM.HAS.LESS.FREE.PORN.IN.ITS.SEARCH.ENGINE.THAN.SECZY.COM&lt;br&gt;&#xD;
GOOGLE.COM.BR&lt;br&gt;&#xD;
GOOGLE.COM.AU&lt;br&gt;&#xD;
GOOGLE.COM&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;
i sent an email to google (france) but they dont seem to&#xD;
react about it. if anyone knows anybody at google that could&#xD;
fix that whois record... :)&lt;br&gt;&#xD;
its last update seems to be : Last update of whois database:&#xD;
Tue, 10 Oct 2006 13:23:10 EDT&lt;/tt&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
