7 Apr 2004 edp   » (Observer)

ok, i made some progress...

cdparanoia uses "LBA" mode in the ioctl to read cd Table Of Contents.

other code uses "MSF" (minutes, seconds, frames) mode instead.

using both modes shows the familiar 150 frame difference (M:S.F -> total vs LBA):

  1.  0:02.33 ->    183 vs     33; delta = -150  [format: 2, datamode: 0]
  2.  2:39.23 ->  11948 vs  11798; delta = -150  [format: 2, datamode: 0]
  3.  3:56.35 ->  17735 vs  17585; delta = -150  [format: 2, datamode: 0]
  4.  6:13.68 ->  28043 vs  27893; delta = -150  [format: 2, datamode: 0]
  5.  8:57.53 ->  40328 vs  40178; delta = -150  [format: 2, datamode: 0]
  6. 10:17.13 ->  46288 vs  46138; delta = -150  [format: 2, datamode: 0]
  7. 11:22.55 ->  51205 vs  51055; delta = -150  [format: 2, datamode: 0]
  8. 13:05.10 ->  58885 vs  58735; delta = -150  [format: 2, datamode: 0]
  9. 14:17.03 ->  64278 vs  64128; delta = -150  [format: 2, datamode: 0]
 10. 15:29.38 ->  69713 vs  69563; delta = -150  [format: 2, datamode: 0]
 11. 17:52.58 ->  80458 vs  80308; delta = -150  [format: 2, datamode: 0]
 12. 18:58.50 ->  85400 vs  85250; delta = -150  [format: 2, datamode: 0]
 13. 20:22.58 ->  91708 vs  91558; delta = -150  [format: 2, datamode: 0]
 14. 22:10.05 ->  99755 vs  99605; delta = -150  [format: 2, datamode: 0]
 15. 25:07.65 -> 113090 vs 112940; delta = -150  [format: 2, datamode: 0]
 16. 26:27.55 -> 119080 vs 118930; delta = -150  [format: 2, datamode: 0]
 17. 28:35.25 -> 128650 vs 128500; delta = -150  [format: 2, datamode: 0]
 18. 31:46.08 -> 142958 vs 142808; delta = -150  [format: 2, datamode: 0]
 19. 33:02.48 -> 148698 vs 148548; delta = -150  [format: 2, datamode: 0]
 20. 33:58.05 -> 152855 vs 152705; delta = -150  [format: 2, datamode: 0]
 21. 34:47.68 -> 156593 vs 156443; delta = -150  [format: 2, datamode: 0]
 22. 36:02.48 -> 162198 vs 162048; delta = -150  [format: 2, datamode: 0]
 23. 39:00.55 -> 175555 vs 175405; delta = -150  [format: 2, datamode: 0]
 24. 39:54.43 -> 179593 vs 179443; delta = -150  [format: 2, datamode: 0]
 25. 41:09.45 -> 185220 vs 185070; delta = -150  [format: 2, datamode: 0]
 26. 42:54.33 -> 193083 vs 192933; delta = -150  [format: 2, datamode: 0]
 27. 50:15.10 -> 226135 vs 225985; delta = -150  [format: 2, datamode: 0]
 28. 51:34.03 -> 232053 vs 231903; delta = -150  [format: 2, datamode: 0]
 29. 52:56.63 -> 238263 vs 238113; delta = -150  [format: 2, datamode: 0]
 30. 54:19.70 -> 244495 vs 244345; delta = -150  [format: 2, datamode: 0]
 31. 56:55.55 -> 256180 vs 256030; delta = -150  [format: 2, datamode: 0]
 32. 59:05.15 -> 265890 vs 265740; delta = -150  [format: 2, datamode: 0]
170. 61:39.73 -> 277498 vs 4794173; delta = 4516675  [format: 2, datamode: 0]

uh, except for the lead-out track; i dont know what's up with that.

Latest blog entries     Older blog entries

New Advogato Features

New HTML Parser: The long-awaited libxml2 based HTML parser code is live. It needs further work but already handles most markup better than the original parser.

Keep up with the latest Advogato features by reading the Advogato status blog.

If you're a C programmer with some spare time, take a look at the mod_virgule project page and help us with one of the tasks on the ToDo list!