<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0.">
  <channel>
    <title>Advogato blog for duff</title>
    <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/duff/</link>
    <description>Advogato blog for duff</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <generator>mod_virgule</generator>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 22:12:46 GMT</pubDate>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2001 22:12:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>29 Jan 2001</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/duff/diary.html?start=5</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/duff/diary.html?start=5</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Well, I haven't written anything here in a while, but
since I have these fleeting thoughts all the time, I decided
that I might as well put them here rather than forgetting
them  &lt;b&gt;:-)&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Today I heard on the radio about a new song from Alice
Cooper called something like "The Little Things" (I don't
remember the exact title).  They interviewed Alice and asked
him what the song was about and he said he was trying to
capture the idea that it's the little things that piss
people off  (the example he used was when someone cuts you
off in traffic , you get all pissed off and want to kill
them) while the big things
go relatively ignored (global polution for instance)
&lt;p&gt;I think Alice Cooper is on the money about society.  Many
people are just  selfish and ignorant and do not take
responsibility for themselves.  People get angry when cut
off because an injustice was done to &lt;b&gt;them&lt;/b&gt;.  Forget
that people make mistakes and that sometimes it's not even
their fault.  Forget that there are bigger problems in the
world that affect us &lt;b&gt;all&lt;/b&gt;.  Forget this world doesn't
need anymore anger or violence. 
&lt;p&gt;To paraphrase Larry Wall (who was probably paraphrasing
someone else), "Be strict in your actions, but liberal in
your reactions"</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2000 15:47:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>26 May 2000</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/duff/diary.html?start=4</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/duff/diary.html?start=4</guid>
      <description>I was just looking at &lt;a
href="http://advogato.org/person/shapr"&gt;shapr&lt;/a&gt;'s diary
entries regarding his Bicycle Repair Man project and it
occurs to me that there should be another relationship type
between people and projects:  Commentor (or is that
Commentator?)

&lt;p&gt; The category would be for people who normally go in the
"special thanks" section of a book.  People who don't
necessarily contribute code, but give lots of ideas and
insight.  I guess they would be
contributors (since they contribute ideas), but my
impression of contributor is contributing code.

&lt;p&gt; All you people who read recent diary entries ... feel free
to comment :-)</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Fri, 7 Apr 2000 19:52:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>7 Apr 2000</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/duff/diary.html?start=3</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/duff/diary.html?start=3</guid>
      <description>So I check advogato this morning to find that I'm suddenly a
Journeyer.  &lt;em&gt;How did this happen?&lt;/em&gt;  Wish I could
say.  I have 1 Dimwit, 2 Apprentice and 1 Journeyer
certifications ...  How that translates to &lt;b&gt;Journeyer&lt;/b&gt;
is beyond me.  I guess I'll have to read the trust metric
document again.

&lt;p&gt; &lt;p&gt; In reading the recent flurry of posts in response to
"Meta",
I think I have to agree with the certification titles need
to be changed.  Here's what I like (with associated numeric
ranking):

&lt;p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Guru&lt;/b&gt; 10&lt;br&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Developer&lt;/b&gt; 5&lt;br&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Apprentice&lt;/b&gt; 3&lt;br&gt;
&lt;b&gt;User&lt;/b&gt; 1&lt;br&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Troll&lt;/b&gt; -1&lt;br&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Wacko&lt;/b&gt; -3&lt;br&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Inept&lt;/b&gt; -5&lt;br&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Anti-Guru&lt;/b&gt; -10&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;b&gt;Anti-Guru&lt;/b&gt;s are people who actively try to destroy
the
free software community.

&lt;p&gt; &lt;p&gt; Why does advogato suddenly seem like a big neural net
project?
</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Fri, 7 Apr 2000 02:50:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>7 Apr 2000</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/duff/diary.html?start=2</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/duff/diary.html?start=2</guid>
      <description>I just certified &lt;a
href="http://advogato.org/person/StevenRainwater"&gt;StevenRainwater&lt;/a&gt;
as a Journeyer.

&lt;p&gt; On what did I base this decision?  He seems to be On The
Road as a Lead Developer in an OSS project and a Contributor
for mod_virqule.  That's assuming I can take him for his
word.  (It may be naive, but I'm a trusting soul  ;-)

&lt;p&gt; Oh!  And this bug in Preview is annoying.  I posted it as a
reply to an article as that's where I noticed the problem. 
I just did a Preview of this diary entry and it doesn't seem
to have the problem.  How odd.  I would have thought that
they would use the same code for both operations as they are
nearly identical.

&lt;p&gt; &lt;b&gt;ARGH!&lt;/b&gt;  I just noticed another Preview bug (at least
for diary entries).  If I screw up
the HTML in this diary entry it hoses the whole page.  You'd
think that with the plethora of HTML parsers out there and
since only a very small subset of HTML is accepted in these
entries that the text could be validated before Preview.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Wed, 5 Apr 2000 14:45:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>5 Apr 2000</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/duff/diary.html?start=1</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/duff/diary.html?start=1</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;It appears that a few people have certified me.  I guess
that makes me certifiable.  :-) &lt;p&gt;&lt;a
href="http://advogato.org/person/lilo"&gt;lilo&lt;/a&gt; seems to
have the same conundrum as I with regard to certification. 
And &lt;a href="http://advogato.org/person/kelly" &gt;kelly&lt;/a&gt;
thinks I'm a Dimwit (no, kelly, I didn't take it personally)
but also thinks that there's no difference between Dimwit
and Master.  Maybe I should certify myself as a Master.
&lt;p&gt;And that's another thing ... why do people certify
themselves?  I think some sort of negative bias should be
instituted for self-certification because you can't trust
what people say about themselves.
</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Wed, 5 Apr 2000 01:12:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>5 Apr 2000</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/duff/diary.html?start=0</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/duff/diary.html?start=0</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Today is my first day using advogato.  It's neat.
&lt;p&gt;I really don't think this ranking system ... excuse me
... "certification system" is really a useful metric of
anything. 
&lt;p&gt;BTW, where do I fall in the ranking?  &lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;I have all
of the skills necessary to participate in an OSS project, I
just haven't because of other things in my life right now. 
&lt;b&gt;Therefore I'm not an Apprentice. &lt;/b&gt;&lt;li&gt; I haven't
made any contributions to OSS other than a few minor
comments here and there on various mailing lists. 
&lt;b&gt;Therefore I'm not a Journeyer.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;li&gt;I'm not the
lead in any OSS project.  &lt;b&gt;Therefore I'm not a
Master&lt;/b&gt;&lt;li&gt;I'm not a dimwit. &lt;b&gt;Therefore I'm not a
Dimwit&lt;/b&gt;  :-)&lt;/ul&gt;  I guess the current entry is
accurate.  &lt;b&gt;I'm an Observer&lt;/b&gt;  But we'll see what other
people have to say about me.  That is ... if anyone says
anything about me.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
