<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Advogato blog for digdude</title>
    <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/digdude/</link>
    <description>Advogato blog for digdude</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <generator>mod_virgule</generator>
    <pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 19:29:05 GMT</pubDate>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2002 07:38:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>14 Nov 2002</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/digdude/diary.html?start=9</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/digdude/diary.html?start=9</guid>
      <description>Today I basically converted my Red Hat 8.0 machine from ext2 to xfs, and implemented devfs.

&lt;p&gt; This took &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;way&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; longer than it should have.

&lt;p&gt; Redhat is not very well setup to work with devfs, even with devfsd installed.  Don't expect your mouse to work.  Expect that somewhere in the boot-up scripts, redhat will try to rewrite your /etc/fstab file with new names (and then not write them back correctly if you use 'devfs=nomount' when you boot)

&lt;p&gt; I had to use my LBT (bbc) disc 35 times today.   That disc rocks.  There are 2 show-stopper bugs in it.  'mount' doesn't work, (but 'mount.real' does)   and 'losetup' is missing, so you can 'mount -o' something, but never release the /dev/loop0, so you can never reboot.  :(   These will have to be fixed soon!  It still seems awesome to be able to use such a little linux disc for doing all this xfs conversion work.

&lt;p&gt; Anyway, finally got the sequence all down, and after mkfs.xfs on a partition, you have to xfs_admin to set the label, since /etc/fstab uses partition labels for mounting.  Grub is also very picky, and has to be re-installed for xfs support to work.

&lt;p&gt; Whew.

&lt;p&gt; Thursday and Friday of this week, I will be at the Open Source Health Care Alliance conference. ( http://www.openparadigms.com/oshca2002 ) If anyone is going to be there, let me know.

</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Mon, 4 Nov 2002 19:17:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>4 Nov 2002</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/digdude/diary.html?start=8</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/digdude/diary.html?start=8</guid>
      <description>So, after years of using &lt;a href="http://www.debian.org" &gt;Debian&lt;/a&gt;, I am trying to learn the Red Hat way.&lt;P&gt;
I still have all those machines at home happily running Debian, but the computer allocated for me at work has &lt;a href="http://www.intel.com/products/desk_lap/chipsets/graphics/index.htm?iid=ipp_845gchpst+body_extreme&amp;" &gt;video chips&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://www.intel.com/design/chipsets/manuals/298600.htm?iid=ipp_845gchpst+prod_ref_82801&amp;" &gt;ethernet chips&lt;/a&gt; that are not in any of the stock installable debian kernels, or XFree packages, so I popped in the RedHat 8.0 CD here at work, and, voila, everything autodetected and is supported. I guess that's why RedHat's stuff has so many patches.&lt;P&gt; So, that and the fact that every other person here uses Redhat has made decide to better my RedHat skills and stick with this set-up for now.&lt;P&gt;
So, first thing I noticed is how limiting Metacity is as a window manager.  Yes, I've read all the gnome-devel lists about how confusing it is to operate a desktop, so that's why the gnome2 environment is so dumbed down.  But, still... I can raise a window with a mouse click, but cannot lower it at all?&lt;P&gt;
Metacity "lower" patches here.  http://david.cdk.com/~dkaiser/metacity</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2002 03:51:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>15 Oct 2002</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/digdude/diary.html?start=7</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/digdude/diary.html?start=7</guid>
      <description>&lt;i&gt;soon&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;very soon&lt;/i&gt; I will be done with this unemployed thing...&lt;p&gt;more news tomorrow&lt;p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2002 14:50:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>17 Jul 2002</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/digdude/diary.html?start=6</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/digdude/diary.html?start=6</guid>
      <description>&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;yawn...&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt; that was fun,&lt;br&gt;&#xD;
</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2000 06:14:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>12 Apr 2000</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/digdude/diary.html?start=5</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/digdude/diary.html?start=5</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Sun, 9 Apr 2000 07:56:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>9 Apr 2000</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/digdude/diary.html?start=4</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/digdude/diary.html?start=4</guid>
      <description>I completely agree with &lt;A
HREF="http://www.advogato.org/person/bneely"&gt;bneely&lt;/a&gt;
about Same-Gnome. &lt;P&gt;Total killer app.&lt;P&gt;I've lost the high
score file from my old laptop, but I'm sure I hit a score of
around 5600 at least once...</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Sat, 8 Apr 2000 05:51:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>8 Apr 2000</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/digdude/diary.html?start=3</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/digdude/diary.html?start=3</guid>
      <description>Spent most of the day on the phone, but got a lot 
accomplished.  All in all it was good.
&lt;P&gt;
Talked to my friend Mac at the coffee shop.  He was 
interested in Advogato, but he doesn't know how to use a 
computer, and we got to thinking:  "How does Advogato and 
it's trust metric system apply to real life situations like 
peace treaties and such."
&lt;P&gt;
So, that got me thinking all the way home.  "What if you
could rank your neighbors as dimwits everytime their dog did
a number to your lawn. " Or "Could I rank them as a
Journeyer because they let me use their pool.
&lt;P&gt;
It dawns on me that ranking systems propably don't have as
much real-life application.
&lt;P&gt;
So, now I'm stuck thinking about things like real-time
ranking systems, or more correctly real-time evaluations in
general.   Like the 5-generals algorithm.  If I recall
correctly, the 5-generals were the 5 right hand men of
Alexander the great (or was it Napoleon?) but whenever
war-time strategy was being decided, they would all vote at
once, then if all five votes didn't agree, they would force
an election, to decide if the dissenting vote(s) were cast
in sound mind.
&lt;P&gt;
The modern 5-generals algorithms are used in things like
space shuttle operations and such.  5 or more computer
systems running in parallel, all receive the same inputs,
and all can issue the same outputs, but whenever one
"decides" differently,  ALL 5 vote as to whether the one is
needing to be shut-down, including the one that is being
voted on.  I have never actually implemented it, but not
having a complete fear of algorithms, I should go look at it
sometime soon.&lt;BR&gt;
But, sometime when I'm not so tired.  :)
&lt;P&gt;Ok, off to bed.  I'm starting to sound confused.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Thu, 6 Apr 2000 04:39:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>6 Apr 2000</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/digdude/diary.html?start=2</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/digdude/diary.html?start=2</guid>
      <description>Spent the day over at &lt;A
HREF="http://www.advogato.org/person/anewsome"&gt;anewsome's&lt;/a&gt;
crib.  DSL rules, it was like being in my own office.  &lt;P&gt;
Spent a major amount of time today developing a system for
classifying and organizing various data of various datatypes
and had to type up a requirements document to support it for
a project at work.   &amp;lt;yawn&amp;gt; I'm at least half-done.
&lt;P&gt;
in the background, grabbed a copy of &lt;A
HREF="http://www.openh323.org"&gt;OpenH323&lt;/a&gt; from CVS,
couldn't get it to build, since they're adding CallerID
support, but it's not finished.  So, I stepped back to the
latest snapshot release, which built everything, except a
couple functions were missing during the link.    :(   More
later...
&lt;P&gt;
Spent a few happy moments chillin with &lt;A
HREF="http://www.advogato.org/person/anewsome"&gt;anewsome&lt;/a&gt;
and Queen Cathleen talking about her neighbors, social
status,
fighting over stupid things like who's kids beat up who's
kids, etc..., housing committees, etc...  made me want to
move to the country.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Wed, 5 Apr 2000 01:27:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>5 Apr 2000</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/digdude/diary.html?start=1</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/digdude/diary.html?start=1</guid>
      <description>Walked over to &lt;A
HREF="http://www.quicknet.net"&gt;Quicknet&lt;/a&gt; today.  Had a
good conversation with Greg, Jonathan,
and a consultant: Craig Southeren, who is one of the
founders of the &lt;A
HREF="http://www.openh323.org"&gt;OpenH323&lt;/a&gt; project.
&lt;P&gt;
OpenH323 looks pretty cool.  Open source version of software
that supports &lt;A
HREF="http://www.openh323.org/standards.html"&gt;real
standards.&lt;/a&gt;  Standards in the true sense of the word. 
H323 is
used in equipment/software from &lt;A
HREF="http://www.openh323.org/h323_clients.html"&gt;just about
everyone!&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
Unfortunately, &lt;A
HREF="http://www.asteriskpbx.com"&gt;Asterisk&lt;/a&gt;, the pbx I
had been working on has not had any real development to
support H323, so I'll continue looking for better PBX
software.
&lt;P&gt;
Tomorrow, I'm going to download and build the OpenH323
stack, should have some interesting technical tidbits then.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Tue, 4 Apr 2000 01:27:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>4 Apr 2000</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/digdude/diary.html?start=0</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/digdude/diary.html?start=0</guid>
      <description>Last night found me pushing the low-end of the performance
curve, my 486 DX2 / 50Mhz, with 20 Mb RAM.  I attempted
installation of the latest frozen Debian GNU/Linux.  I(t)
failed miserably due to hardware issues.  I need to replace
the IDE controller, among other things. ;)  The poor thing's
had nothing but DOS on it for so many years, maybe it's
hopeless...
&lt;P&gt;
Checked out the latest &lt;A
HREF="http://www.asteriskpbx.com"&gt;Asterisk&lt;/a&gt; code, and got
it built.   I'm working on turning the 486 into a comm
server, hosting my phone/v-mail/fax, etc...
So far, I'm thinking I'll run a rather recent dev kernel, or
2.4 for sure when it's out, since they have the &lt;A
HREF="http://www.quicknet.net"&gt;Quicknet&lt;/a&gt; PhoneJack driver
in, but for now, I'm still downloading the latest one from
Quicknet, who I'm going to see tomorrow.  :)   Is VoIP
really the way
of the future?  We'll see.
</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
