<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Advogato blog for chalst</title>
    <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/chalst/</link>
    <description>Advogato blog for chalst</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <generator>mod_virgule</generator>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 11:46:20 GMT</pubDate>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Fri, 5 Feb 2010 07:09:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>5 Feb 2010</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/chalst/diary.html?start=261</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/chalst/diary.html?start=261</guid>
      <description>&lt;b&gt;A Compromising Situation&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;
Take a look at &lt;a href="http://www.advogato.org/person/humaurtumonline/" &gt;humaurtumonline&lt;/a&gt;...&#xD;
&lt;p&gt;&#xD;
The URL isn't right, but a spammer with Journeyer all the same.&#xD;
&lt;p&gt;&#xD;
ncm, atai, explain yourselves...</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Thu, 4 Feb 2010 09:33:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>4 Feb 2010</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/chalst/diary.html?start=260</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/chalst/diary.html?start=260</guid>
      <description>&lt;b&gt;Recentspam&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;
Wow, &lt;b&gt;aryson&lt;/b&gt; is serious!  22 SEO spam bulletins together!  A new &#xD;
sleazeball, or an old antagonist with a new strategy?&#xD;
&lt;p&gt;&#xD;
Who doubts that we are talking about 22 paying clients here?</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Wed, 3 Feb 2010 12:11:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>3 Feb 2010</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/chalst/diary.html?start=259</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/chalst/diary.html?start=259</guid>
      <description>&lt;b&gt;Congratulations&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;
&lt;a href="http://www.advogato.org/person/mjg59/diary/237.html" &gt;mjg59&lt;/a&gt; &#xD;
reports that he's engaged.  Congratulations, and I wish him some &#xD;
peace with his family's sure-to-come odd behaviour...&#xD;
&lt;p&gt;&#xD;
I saw &lt;a href="http://www.facebook.com/people/Mathew-&#xD;
Garrett/632845764" &gt;a lovely photo&lt;/a&gt; of the newly engaged couple, though I &#xD;
have to say that &#xD;
Matthew looks like he has put on a bit of weight! </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 10:57:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>18 Jan 2010</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/chalst/diary.html?start=258</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/chalst/diary.html?start=258</guid>
      <description>&lt;b&gt;A POSIX question&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;
I posted the following to StackOverflow.com, and put about a third of the &#xD;
reputation points I had into it:&#xD;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&#xD;
&lt;a href="http://superuser.com/questions/95736/impossible-paths" &gt;Impossible paths&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;
Are there any legal paths in POSIX that cannot be associated with a file, regular &#xD;
or irregular? That is, for which test -e "$LEGITIMATEPOSIXPATHNAME" cannot &#xD;
succeed?&#xD;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;&#xD;
I'm not very impressed by the smartness or helpfulness of the folk there, so I &#xD;
doubt that I will get adequate responses.  I should just read the standards, but I &#xD;
am not feeling unlazy.&#xD;
&lt;p&gt;&#xD;
Oh, ... and a Happy New Year, Advogato!</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 12:32:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>25 Dec 2009</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/chalst/diary.html?start=257</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/chalst/diary.html?start=257</guid>
      <description>&lt;b&gt;Merry Christmas, Advogato&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;
I'm typing this entry while talking to relatives on the phone.&#xD;
</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 09:19:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>10 Dec 2009</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/chalst/diary.html?start=256</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/chalst/diary.html?start=256</guid>
      <description>&lt;b&gt;Guile's eval&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;
&lt;a href="http://www.advogato.org/person/wingo/diary/324.html" &gt;wingo &#xD;
posts&lt;/a&gt; a meta-circular evaluator for Guile.  I've not time now, but I want &#xD;
to take a closer look at the code.&#xD;
&lt;p&gt;&#xD;
I have two thoughts about eval for guile:&#xD;
&lt;ol&gt;&#xD;
&lt;li&gt;It can be good to write the target scheme in such a way that it can &#xD;
allocate all of its closures on the stack, as scheme48-&amp;gt;prescheme does.  &#xD;
This &#xD;
is a nontrivial transformation, but it means that (i) you don't need to worry &#xD;
about TCO, since tail calls are achieved by popping the stack, and so (ii) you &#xD;
can use pretty, dimwitted ceval-like code without trouble, and (iii) it's a &#xD;
stretch to call this an interpreter, but since you only need source-to-source &#xD;
transformation, it's higher level than what we usually mean by compilation.  &#xD;
Dan Friedman has written up some relevant stuff on the transformations &#xD;
needed to do this.&#xD;
&lt;li&gt;More generally, is there any interest in rearchitecting the elisp bytecode &#xD;
so that it fits the Guile VM?&#xD;
&lt;/ol&gt;&#xD;
Cf. &lt;a href="http://www.mail-archive.com/guile-&#xD;
devel@gnu.org/msg02277.html" &gt;let's bytecode it!&lt;/a&gt;: message by wingo &#xD;
to &#xD;
guile-devel, April 2008.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Mon, 7 Dec 2009 17:27:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>7 Dec 2009</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/chalst/diary.html?start=255</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/chalst/diary.html?start=255</guid>
      <description>&lt;b&gt;Recentlog&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;
&lt;a href="http://www.advogato.org/person/dmarti/diary/317.html" &gt;dmarti &#xD;
writes&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;i&gt;Wikipedia knows the difference between a &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baler" &gt;baler&lt;/a&gt; and a &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bailer" &gt;bailer&lt;/a&gt;. The &lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/06/opinion/06diamond.html?&#xD;
_r=1&amp;amp;pagewanted=all" &gt;New York Times&lt;/a&gt;, not so much.&lt;/i&gt;&#xD;
&lt;p&gt;&#xD;
It does so build up one's confidence into the accuracy of the reporting, &#xD;
doesn't it?   John McIntyre notes, in &lt;a href="http://johnemcintyre.blogspot.com/2009/12/save-money-cut-back-&#xD;
on-editing.html" &gt;Save money: Cut back on editing&lt;/a&gt;, a correction in the &#xD;
&lt;i&gt;Washington Post&lt;/i&gt;: &#xD;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&#xD;
A Nov. 26 article in the District edition of Local Living incorrectly said a Public &#xD;
Enemy song declared 9/11 a joke. The song refers to 911, the emergency &#xD;
phone number. &#xD;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;&#xD;
So, which is your favourite Newspaper Of Record?&#xD;
&lt;p&gt;&#xD;
dmarti continues: &lt;i&gt;But the fit and finish of the writing in peer media is &#xD;
often better than what cut-back Mainstream Media outlets can manage any &#xD;
more. I suppose that's good news.&lt;/i&gt;.&#xD;
&lt;p&gt;&#xD;
Quite.  When you compromise quality to save money, you save the most &#xD;
visible cuts, like checking whether words mean what you think, 'til last.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Fri, 4 Dec 2009 19:56:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>4 Dec 2009</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/chalst/diary.html?start=254</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/chalst/diary.html?start=254</guid>
      <description>&lt;b&gt;Recentspam&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;
Trollaxor (Grant Hayes) isn't a spammer, on any reasonable definition of the &#xD;
term.  Who all's been giving him a spam rating of 12?</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Thu, 3 Dec 2009 11:09:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>3 Dec 2009</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/chalst/diary.html?start=253</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/chalst/diary.html?start=253</guid>
      <description>&lt;b&gt;Recentspam&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;
Account &lt;i&gt;SimpleMLMSponsoring&lt;/i&gt; spams the Facebook profile of Ian &#xD;
Anthony Clarke, a self-styled MLM and SEO guru.  His website features such &#xD;
enticing messages as: &lt;i&gt;HERE'S WHAT I GOT FOR YOU : A FREE 20-page eBook &#xD;
called the "Online MLM Success Formula" and information on an opportunity for &#xD;
you to make hundreds online...&lt;/i&gt;.&#xD;
&lt;p&gt;&#xD;
Simply marvellous!  He got what can make not just tens, but hundreds online!&#xD;
&lt;p&gt;&#xD;
I &#xD;
would love to read his FREE eBook, but unfortunately I apparently would need to &#xD;
give Ian&#xD;
my email address, and I'm sure that must be against my principles.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 08:46:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>19 Nov 2009</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/chalst/diary.html?start=252</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/chalst/diary.html?start=252</guid>
      <description>&lt;b&gt;Recentlog&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;
&lt;a href="http://www.advogato.org/person/bagder/diary/569.html" &gt;bagder &#xD;
is &#xD;
overwhelmed&lt;/a&gt; by the success of his projects and can't keep on top of &#xD;
bug &#xD;
reports, and says &lt;i&gt;Since this situation is still fairly new to me, I need to &#xD;
learn &#xD;
on how to adapt to it. How to deal with a stream of issues that is &#xD;
overwhelming &#xD;
and I must select what particular things I care about and what to &amp;ldquo;let &#xD;
through&amp;rdquo;.&lt;/i&gt;&#xD;
&lt;p&gt;&#xD;
It seems to me that the right response to this situation is to put less energy &#xD;
into &#xD;
solving bugs, and more energy into documenting the projects so that other &#xD;
FS &#xD;
types can understand the code.  I think that a fair proportion of people who &#xD;
take &#xD;
bur reporting seriously are people who want to understand how the code &#xD;
works, &#xD;
and a fair proportion of people who have some grasp of how the code works &#xD;
will &#xD;
be willing to tackle items on a list of important bugs and issues.  Get the &#xD;
interest to work for you, and not against you.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
