<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0.">
  <channel>
    <title>Advogato blog for chalst</title>
    <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/chalst/</link>
    <description>Advogato blog for chalst</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <generator>mod_virgule</generator>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 22:48:07 GMT</pubDate>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 13:32:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>24 Jul 2008</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/chalst/diary.html?start=195</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/chalst/diary.html?start=195</guid>
      <description>&lt;b&gt;Mode 7&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;
&lt;a href="http://www.advogato.org/person/tagishandy/diary/19.html" &gt;tagishandy links&lt;/a&gt; to some 8x8 BBC micro fonts he has made available.  I &#xD;
saw that acb had made available &lt;a href="http://dev.null.org/fonts/" &gt;some &#xD;
BBC teletext fonts&lt;/a&gt;.  I think those are not the exact same fonts as per the &#xD;
BBC micro teletext chip, though they are of BBC provenance.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 10:12:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>17 Jul 2008</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/chalst/diary.html?start=194</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/chalst/diary.html?start=194</guid>
      <description>&lt;b&gt;The menace of new accounts&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;
&lt;a href="http://www.advogato.org/person/lkcl/diary/473.html" &gt;lkcl &#xD;
writes&lt;/a&gt; some advice on creating new accounts that would, if followed, &#xD;
save legitimate accounts from being deleted, and certs jbaker up to &#xD;
apprentice.&#xD;
&#xD;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;a href="http://www.advogato.org/person/ncm/diary/278.html" &gt;ncm &#xD;
summarises&lt;/a&gt; the spammer menace:&#xD;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&#xD;
My experience is that the account deletion threshold is set so (artificially) &#xD;
high that the only way to get a spammer account deleted is to mark them &#xD;
down as spammers unless it's dead clear they're not. Even then lots of fake &#xD;
accounts get through. Mostly the real spammers don't start spamming &#xD;
immediately; they appear to be accumulating fake accounts and holding them &#xD;
in reserve.&#xD;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;&#xD;
Well, fair enough, this shoot first, ask questions later approach will certainly &#xD;
reduce the conceivable possibilities for spammers to abuse Advogato, but it's &#xD;
not how the &#xD;
spam rating feature was meant to be used, and the history of Advogato has &#xD;
been to apply fixes, rarely needed, when problems actually emerge.&#xD;
&lt;p&gt;&#xD;
You're advocating aggressively marking accounts as spam without &#xD;
articulating a &#xD;
clear threat to Advogato: what are spammers going to do with their arsenal of &#xD;
cert-juiceless accounts?  I'm bothered that it makes Advogato less friendly to &#xD;
neophyte developers without serving any useful purpose.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 10:43:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>16 Jul 2008</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/chalst/diary.html?start=193</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/chalst/diary.html?start=193</guid>
      <description>&lt;b&gt;Overzealous culling of new Advogato accounts&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;
I see that the new account &lt;a href="http://www.advogato.org/person/jbaker/" &gt;jbaker&lt;/a&gt;, linking to &lt;a href="http://bakerdesignz.com/" &gt;http://bakerdesignz.com&lt;/a&gt; has attracted &#xD;
a spam rating of 13.  Looking at &#xD;
the articles posted there, this seems to be the business site of a Justin Baker &#xD;
who uses javascript in his work, and wants to share some site design and &#xD;
javascript under GPL.  This looks worthy of an apprentice certification, and &#xD;
certainly should not be counted spam.&#xD;
&lt;p&gt;&#xD;
In general, as Steven Rainwater has already pointed out, a lot of new accounts &#xD;
that don't spam anything are being marked as spam by quite a few &#xD;
people.  Unpromising new accounts don't weigh much; don't mark as spam &#xD;
accounts that aren't actually being abusive in some way.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 12:26:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>15 May 2008</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/chalst/diary.html?start=192</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/chalst/diary.html?start=192</guid>
      <description>&lt;b&gt;Monotone vs. git&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;
Observe: &lt;a href="http://projects.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-&#xD;
devel/2008-March/004714.html" &gt;Reconsidering the work flow and how the &#xD;
SCM system fits in&lt;/a&gt; on the Openembedded-devel mailing list.&#xD;
&#xD;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;p&gt; Questions:&#xD;
&lt;ol&gt;&#xD;
&lt;li&gt;The motivation for the move was difficulties they had with mtn's &#xD;
propagate.  &#xD;
What, I wonder, were they were doing different with their repositories than &#xD;
other &#xD;
users?&#xD;
&lt;li&gt;Mamona migrated their repository to git.  How does this work?  Are there &#xD;
conversion tools?  Did they agree upon a time when all of the &#xD;
developers converted their repositories?  Or did they have encroaching &#xD;
gradualism, where a gatekeeper converted, and others converted when they &#xD;
needed to talk to the gatekeeper?&#xD;
&lt;/ol&gt;&#xD;
&lt;p&gt;&#xD;
&lt;b&gt;Postscript&lt;/b&gt;: I guess &lt;a href="http://progetti.arstecnica.it/tailor" &gt;tailor&lt;/a&gt; can handle the project &#xD;
migration.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 11:43:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>15 May 2008</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/chalst/diary.html?start=191</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/chalst/diary.html?start=191</guid>
      <description>&lt;b&gt;Food prices: stabilisation?&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;
The &lt;i&gt;Financial Times&lt;/i&gt; observes that the &lt;a href="http://www.fao.org/worldfoodsituation/FoodPricesIndex" &gt;UN FAO &#xD;
food prices index&lt;/a&gt; has stabilised, showing a tiny  decrease for April &#xD;
(216.7, compared to the revised 217.0 for March).  I'm guessing that this is a &#xD;
response to the high predicted wheat harvests for this year.  This is, by no &#xD;
means, the end to the food price crisis, but it might end the recent supply &#xD;
panic.&#xD;
&#xD;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;p&gt; Martin Wolf's column for two weeks ago, &lt;a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/2e5b2f36-1608-11dd-880a-&#xD;
0000779fd2ac.html?nclick_check=1" &gt;Food crisis is a chance to reform &#xD;
global agriculture&lt;/a&gt;, argued that speculation is unlikely to have played &#xD;
much role in the ramping up of food prices, since food price inventories have &#xD;
been so low.  So we shouldn't expect any sort of speculative unwinding of &#xD;
food prices: they are unlikely to "bounce down" in the way that stock markets &#xD;
have done.  Instead the reason for high food prices has been rapidly growing &#xD;
supply not keeping up with even more rapidly growing demand (part of which &#xD;
is the growing demand for meat, particularly in China) and cost of inputs to &#xD;
agriculture, particularly oil.&#xD;
&#xD;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;a href="http://blogs.ft.com/wolfforum/2008/04/food-crisis-is-a-&#xD;
chance-to-reform-global-agriculture/#comment-11083" &gt;Paul Collier's &#xD;
comment&lt;/a&gt; on Martin Wolf's article argues that a general acceptance of &#xD;
GM foods, particularly in Europe, and promotion of large-scale agriculture (ie. &#xD;
industrialised), particularly in Africa, is an important part of any effective &#xD;
response to high food prices.  Just threw that in, in case this post was lacking &#xD;
in controversial assertions.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 10:51:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>24 Apr 2008</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/chalst/diary.html?start=190</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/chalst/diary.html?start=190</guid>
      <description>&lt;b&gt;Food prices: the ideological assault on food security&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;
Daniel Davies asks &lt;a href="http://d-&#xD;
squareddigest.blogspot.com/2008/04/whats-that-got-to-do-with-price-&#xD;
of.html" &gt;What's that got to do with the price of wheat, rice, maize and &#xD;
ethanol?&lt;/a&gt;, talking about the dismantling of food security infrastructure in &#xD;
the third world, carried out in the name of free market dogmatism.  Quote:&#xD;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&#xD;
I think the underlying idea, in as much as there was one, was that &#xD;
international aid was a more efficient way of providing food security than &#xD;
domestic reserves and price controls. Which has a certain plausibility to it, as &#xD;
long as you only look at one country at a time and assume that food &#xD;
shortages will be caused by ecological famines, which are more or less &#xD;
uncorrelated between regions, rather than a global inflation in food prices &#xD;
which overwhelms the capacity of the food aid industry, and which arrives at &#xD;
a time of fiscal strain in donor nations. Of course, the general approach of &#xD;
assuming that one's risks are uncorrelated and manageable is one that has &#xD;
been causing all sorts of problems in the world economy of late.&#xD;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 12:16:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>22 Apr 2008</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/chalst/diary.html?start=189</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/chalst/diary.html?start=189</guid>
      <description>&lt;b&gt;Some trust-metric references&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;
All the references listed below link to PDFs, with my comments in italics.&#xD;
&lt;ul&gt;&#xD;
&lt;li&gt;Weeks, 2001. &lt;a href="http://www.eyetap.org/~maali/trust-&#xD;
papers/weeks01understanding.pdf" &gt;Understanding Trust Management &#xD;
Systems&lt;/a&gt;.  &lt;i&gt;Crucial paper for understanding much recent work on &#xD;
trust-metrics.  Presents framework, motivates it with examples, and shows &#xD;
PKI can &#xD;
be modelled using it.&lt;/i&gt;&#xD;
&lt;li&gt;Carbone, Nielsen and Sassone, 2003. &lt;a href="http://www.brics.dk/RS/03/4/BRICS-RS-03-4.pdf" &gt;A Formal Model &#xD;
for Trust in Dynamic Networks.&lt;/a&gt;.   &lt;i&gt;Proposes a simple domain-&#xD;
theoretic formalisation of what a model of trust is that provides the basis for &#xD;
some significant later work.&lt;/i&gt;&#xD;
&lt;li&gt;Twigg and Dimmock, 2003.  &lt;a href="http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~adt28/papers/ESTM-&#xD;
twigga_attackresistance-FINAL.pdf" &gt;Attack-Resistance of Computational &#xD;
Trust Models&lt;/a&gt;.  &lt;i&gt;Synthetic exposition of several trust-metrics that &#xD;
have some degree of attack resistance.  Good exposition of Raph's metric, &#xD;
sgives alternate proof of attack resistance by order-theoretic reasoning.&lt;/i&gt;&#xD;
&lt;li&gt;Moreton and Twigg, 2003.  &lt;a href="http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~adt28/papers/2003-trading-&#xD;
trust.pdf" &gt;Trading in Trust, Tokens, and Stamps&lt;/a&gt;.  &lt;i&gt;Proposes system &#xD;
for &#xD;
adding trust trading to trust-metrics by stamps, and argues for advantages &#xD;
of &#xD;
this system.   Interesting for Advogato: could provide a more principled &#xD;
means of bringing in new members than just rejigging weights.&lt;/i&gt; &#xD;
&lt;li&gt;Ziegler and Lausen, 2005.  &lt;a href="http://www.informatik.uni-&#xD;
freiburg.de/~cziegler/papers/ISF-05-CR.pdf" &gt;Propagation Models for Trust &#xD;
and Distrust in Social Networks&lt;/a&gt;.  &lt;i&gt;Motivates criteria for success of &#xD;
trust-metrics when applied to social networks, including attack resistance.  &#xD;
Proposes a new algorithm, which they call &lt;b&gt;Appleseed&lt;/b&gt; and which is &#xD;
based on the spreading activation technique, which they &#xD;
compare to Raph's version.  This work is based in part on Ziegler's PhD thesis, &#xD;
&lt;/i&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.freidok.uni-&#xD;
freiburg.de/freidok/volltexte/2005/1804/pdf/Thesis.pdf" &gt;Towards &#xD;
Decentralized Recommender Systems&lt;/a&gt;.&#xD;
&lt;/ul&gt;&#xD;
I'm curious as to the origin of Raph's talk of "good", "bad", and "confused" &#xD;
nodes.  Is it his novel usage, or did he get it from elsewhere?&#xD;
&#xD;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;p&gt; &lt;p&gt; I'm amused also to read references sections that cite &#xD;
Raph's &#xD;
abandoned &#xD;
trust -metrics thesis as if it was a successfully defended one.  Folks who run &#xD;
into &#xD;
the thesis he did write will no doubt conclude he is one of the select few who &#xD;
wrote two PhDs concurrently...  </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 09:28:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>17 Apr 2008</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/chalst/diary.html?start=188</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/chalst/diary.html?start=188</guid>
      <description>&lt;b&gt;Food prices&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;
I've been thinking and worrying about food prices more and more over the &#xD;
last four &#xD;
weeks, and I see that &lt;a href="http://skvidal.wordpress.com/2008/04/17/almost-2-years-ago/" &gt;skvidal shares my worries&lt;/a&gt;.&#xD;
&lt;p&gt;&#xD;
In fact, he doesn't worry enough!  When he talks of food prices "spiking", &#xD;
there's more to the story.  The &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldman_Sachs_Commodity_Index" &gt;S&amp;amp;P-GSCI agricultural commodity price index&lt;/a&gt;, &#xD;
which is the main aggregate food price index, has &#xD;
shown a nearly three fold increase from  Jan 2005 until the beginning of this &#xD;
year.  Given the terrible access to credit poor farmers face, this is likely to &#xD;
mean that food prices, already difficult for many to afford, will get higher as &#xD;
the year progresses.  If there is nothing done to relieve the situation, it will &#xD;
spell immense suffering and political instability in much of the world.&#xD;
&lt;p&gt;&#xD;
It's a scary picture, and if it isn't ignored by the world media, not enough &#xD;
attention is drawn to just how serious this all is.  It's pretty damn clear that &#xD;
the story matters more than the bloody farce in Iraq (which has contributed to &#xD;
it by pushing up oil prices), and it is more important than the financial &#xD;
turmoil shaking the world right now (though that will make it harder to do &#xD;
anything to help).&#xD;
&lt;p&gt;&#xD;
Can we do anything to help?  Skvidal has suggestions: I wonder if growing &#xD;
food is an option for me?  lkcl's article &lt;a href="http://www.advogato.org/article/967.html" &gt;Singularity of &#xD;
computing&lt;/a&gt;, might have something to do with food price stability in the &#xD;
future, though I don't suppose this kind of thinking about technology can &#xD;
help with this year's crisis.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 21:35:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>13 Apr 2008</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/chalst/diary.html?start=187</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/chalst/diary.html?start=187</guid>
      <description>&lt;b&gt;What should I believe?&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;
On Friday, the &lt;i&gt;Financial Times&lt;/i&gt; tells me how Germans feel &#xD;
Schadenfreude towards Anglophone countries, because the economic pain those &#xD;
countries are suffering will pass them by, because of the fairly healthy state of &#xD;
the German finance system, growing internal demand, and because the peculiar &#xD;
makeup of Germany's export markets puts it in a good position to weather the &#xD;
coming global economic downturn.&#xD;
&lt;p&gt;&#xD;
On Saturday the &lt;i&gt;Financial Times&lt;/i&gt; tells me how Germany is headed for a &#xD;
nasty fall, because domestic demand is faltering, and its export-centric &#xD;
economy is particularly vulnerable to the coming global economic downturn.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 12:19:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>26 Mar 2008</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/chalst/diary.html?start=186</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/chalst/diary.html?start=186</guid>
      <description>&lt;b&gt;Advogato certifications again&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;
I've just certed &lt;a href="http://www.advogato.org/person/henrique/" &gt;henrique&lt;/a&gt;, despite his not &#xD;
having a link to &#xD;
anything identifying him and saying what free software projects he is involved &#xD;
in.&#xD;
&lt;p&gt;&#xD;
This is generally against my policy, but the Henrique Romano involved in Django &#xD;
and some other python projects doesn't seem to have a home page, and he does &#xD;
post contentful diary entries here, so...&#xD;
&lt;p&gt;&#xD;
As a general point for newcomers seeking certs, I, and I think others, pay more &#xD;
attention to diary entries than account creation, and to some extent I trust local &#xD;
diary content more than RSS feeds.&#xD;
&#xD;
&#xD;
&#xD;
</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
