DEV300_m30
The unused method listings are updated for every release, i.e. the latest DEV300_m30.
The current un-integrated patches are listed here, with the largest set of unused code in sc scheduled for removal in workspace koheicoderemoval
Microsoft Paper Sizes
The Windows Documentation has some confusion around the two different JIS and ISO B paper types.
DMPAPER_B4 B4 (JIS) 250 x 354 mm DMPAPER_B5 B5 (JIS) 182 x 257 mm DMPAPER_ISO_B4 B4 (ISO) 250 x 353 mm DMPAPER_B6_JIS B6 (JIS) 128 x 182 mm
i.e. DMPAPER_B5 is documented as JIS and the documented dimensions match that format. While DMPAPER_B4 is then documented as JIS but the documented dimensions match the ISO format B5 of 250 × 353 mm. Given the presence of DMPAPER_ISO_B4 and the absence of DMPAPER_B4_JIS I’ll bet that it is really the JIS size of 257 x 364, which is backed up by the PPD Specification stating that the Microsoft DMPAPER_B4 size is 257×364 and by the Microsoft Word UI which lists B4 (JIS) with (correct) dimensions of 257×364.
Turning our eyes to the Excel Documentation we have more confusion with the XlPaperSize enumeration. Here we have…
xlPaperA5 A5 (148 mm x 210 mm) xlPaperB4 B4 (250 mm x 354 mm) xlPaperB5 A5 (148 mm x 210 mm)
Well what size is xlPaperB5 ? Is it truly ISO A5 (148 mm x 210 mm) like the comment says. Or might it be ISO B5, i.e. 176 × 250 mm. Or, seeing as the XlPaperSize enumeration has the same values as the DMPAPER values for all other values, are both xlPaperB4 and xlPaperB5 actually the same values as DMPAPER_B4 and DMPAPER_B5, which we’ve earlier determined are JIS B4 and B5 sizes, and not ISO sizes at all. That’s the most likely answer, i.e. the text is completely and totally wrong for xlPaperB4/xlPaperB5
Who uses A4, and who uses Letter ?
At unicode.org the only locales listed as using Letter are the US and Canada.
Wikipedia agrees that only the US and Canada officially don’t use A4, but claims that in Mexico, Colombia, Chile and the Philippines Letter is nevertheless commonly used. Meanwhile at Microsoft the list of Letter using nations is: The US, Canada, Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Mexico, Venezuela and “Latin American countries”
As I’ve tried to document here, currently GTK thinks that the US, Canada and Puerto Rico are Letter users, while OpenOffice.org thinks that the list is the US, Canada, Mexico and Venezuela.
So, I still wonder, which nations excluding the US and Canada, would one truly find Letter as the true default in-use paper size.
DEV300_m24
A pleasing reduction of 160 methods from DEV300_m20 to DEV300_m24 as the package, goodies, embeddedobj, xmlhelp, basctl etc patches are integrated
DEV300_m19 (and m68k)
The DEV300_m19 callcatcher logs show a small but steady shrinkage improvement as more cleanup patches make their way into head.
In other news, I ported uno to m68k so OOo3 builds and functions on m68k under qemu. The sight of a running m68k OOo is somehow incredibly amusing.
DEV300_m17
Latest callcatcher results DEV300_m17 show a modest improvement as unused hwpfilter patch gets integrated, though there’s still an unused destructor, pointing more towards a potential resource leak where it should be used rather than get removed.
DEV300_m14 callcatcher
And DEV300_m14 results are available, with the integration of the binfilter fixes (thanks mba) unused symbol count has halved since DEV300_m13 and tumbles down the charts. I’ve extended callcatcher to understand basic map files so it can be used on non-terminal modules which have map files. Which extends the coverage to a further 25 modules.
one of those weeks
See as gcc ate my starbasic with -fno-strict-aliasing it prompted me to check if we still need -fno-strict-aliasing anyway given all the warning cleanups of the last year. The short answer is definitely :-), but it looks doable to make it possible, and I’ve gotten it to at least launch with -fstrict-aliasing which should be sufficient to do some measurements on it next week to see if there is any measurable difference. Unfortunately while I can (probably) make Ooo -fstrict-aliasing good there are a gadzillion warnings from the stlport headers used on i386 builds so unless stlport was bumped up to one of the later versions where the warnings are fixed (or stlport dropped and gcc’s stl used like we did for x86_64) then only non-i386 users could get the benefit.
Some other random thoughts to look at to see if they’d matter a damn are:
FOAF updates: Trust rankings are now exported, making the data available to other users and websites. An external FOAF URI has been added, allowing users to link to an additional FOAF file.
Keep up with the latest Advogato features by reading the Advogato status blog.
If you're a C programmer with some spare time, take a look at the mod_virgule project page and help us with one of the tasks on the ToDo list!