<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Advogato blog for AustinBlues</title>
    <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/AustinBlues/</link>
    <description>Advogato blog for AustinBlues</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <generator>mod_virgule</generator>
    <pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 14:04:49 GMT</pubDate>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Tue, 6 Mar 2001 23:59:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>6 Mar 2001</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/AustinBlues/diary.html?start=9</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/AustinBlues/diary.html?start=9</guid>
      <description>Put CPIA Milestone 6 pre-release up on my Web site.  If
Ricoh's happy, it is going to be a project on Source Forge. 
Then we can add some more developers.

&lt;p&gt; doc++ is nice, but trying to force it to generate C++/Java
style docs for O-O C is a bit of a hack and not a clever
one.  I may have to hack doc++ to get what I want.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Fri, 2 Mar 2001 04:11:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>2 Mar 2001</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/AustinBlues/diary.html?start=8</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/AustinBlues/diary.html?start=8</guid>
      <description>Yesterday I pushed a review of "Apache Desktop Reference"
out the door via e-mail.  Received a acknowledgement back
and note not to worry about getting a cover image.  Both
nice.

&lt;p&gt; Today I pushed a bit of documentation out.  It required
pushing myself.  I promised I'd finish this.  I just want to
be finished with that project.  I figure I have a couple of
days before I will get enough responses back that I have to
do the rest of it.  There should be a day or two to work on
some
of the fun pieces.

&lt;p&gt; I hooked up the new 17" LCD flat panel display.  I shifted
from 1024x768 to 1280x1024 resolution.  Now I have to get
all the fonts resized in all the apps to something I can
read all day long without going blind.

&lt;p&gt; The flat panel display sat on the floor overnight.  SuSE 7.1
has been sitting on the floor for almost a week, waiting for
some time to
install it, and fiddle with it, and rebuild or download the
things it breaks, and time to play with the new features,
and built a firewall with IPtables, and try out XFree86 4.0,
and try the 2.4 kernel, and then put it all back together so
I can get some paying work done.  Wish I had money, space,
time, and air conditioning for a work machine and a play
machine to try some cutting edge stuff, and another play
machine for games.

&lt;p&gt; To quote the sage Pogo: "We are faced with insurmountable
opportunities."</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2001 00:58:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>14 Feb 2001</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/AustinBlues/diary.html?start=7</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/AustinBlues/diary.html?start=7</guid>
      <description>I have been thinking about Extreme Programming and Bazaar
style development.  It seems to me that both are development
models for extraverts - people who get energy from being
with other people.  Extraverts like to think out loud, i.e.,
the bazaar.  Introverts prefer to work it all out privately
before presenting publically, i.e., the cathedral.
  I have done some of the two person, one terminal work for
debugging sysadmin problems.  We called it "getting the
intersection of our blindspots".  It is effective, intense,
and draining.  I think three hours a day is about I could
stand without wearing out.  I'm not terribly introverted as
programmers go, so I wonder how this works for the general
programmer population.
  With the adoption of these two models, I expect to see
more extraverts in programming.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2000 03:34:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>28 Sep 2000</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/AustinBlues/diary.html?start=6</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/AustinBlues/diary.html?start=6</guid>
      <description>My dayjob's office is going distributed and virtual. 
Somebody dropped the ball and the new office won't be
built-out until a month or two after the old lease runs
out.  Now we have to tease apart years of cruft, and stacks
of shared two gig drives.  Wasabi has a new 30GB drive and I
have one more day to get all the imported filesystems moved
onto the new drive.
  Either we are hammering it too hard and it is dying,
overheating, take your pick, or it is bad.  I copy and I get
I/O errors.  I've tried tarring and untarring, similar
results.  Lots of permissions denied as root (the other
Solaris boxes don't necessarily extend root priviledges)!  I
end up with directories with no contents, not even . and ..
and I can't delete them.  I've run fsck 3-4 times cleaning
up the mess and then creating another one.
  I have successfully tarred onto the original drive with no
problems.  I can move it to the new drive and it compares. 
Now to try expanding the tarball from either the old drive
or the new drive on to the new drive with no NFS volumes
involved.
  The new drive is noisy too.  Just two screws holding it
the skids.  I like solid equipment that doesn't rattle.  I
sleep better at night.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2000 18:09:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>22 Sep 2000</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/AustinBlues/diary.html?start=5</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/AustinBlues/diary.html?start=5</guid>
      <description>So somebody does read my blathering. Terje Bless
&amp;lt;link@tss.no&amp;gt; pointed out the Internet host names are
case-insensitive.  Not everything is the Internet, but maybe
it is time to re-examine this for LANs.  I tried my home LAN
and  on the SuSE 6.1 Linux box - ping and nmap don't care
about the case.  Same for the RedHat 6.1 Linux and Solaris 7
boxes at work.  I'll see if I can con one of the Windows NT
users to check it out.  Same  for the Windows 95 and 98
boxes at home when I can reach the power switches.

&lt;p&gt; Now I wonder what system I was using when I concluded that
hostnames are case sensitive.  Probably not something in the
personal computer world.

&lt;p&gt; Maybe time for an old dog to learn some new tricks.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2000 18:49:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>21 Sep 2000</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/AustinBlues/diary.html?start=4</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/AustinBlues/diary.html?start=4</guid>
      <description>All our computers at work and at home are spelled all
lowercase, the usual practice.  However, proper nouns in
English are initial caps.  Who's right?  They are definitely
proper nouns.  It also causes some awkwardness, especially
as the first word in a sentence.  If the poor user enters
the name with initial cap, "host not found". Either the
grammar/language usage needs to change or naming practice
changes.  Is this speciesism (sp?)  carbon based lifeforms
get "real", proper names with initial caps, computers
don't.  Or is Erwin in User Friendly cutting edge?</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Fri, 1 Sep 2000 20:26:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>1 Sep 2000</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/AustinBlues/diary.html?start=3</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/AustinBlues/diary.html?start=3</guid>
      <description>Got telephone SPAM yesterday from a tech recruiter.  He was
looking to help a client with unstated requirements, yada,
yada, yada.  I gave him nothing: no hope, no leads, no
names, etc.  Couple of minutes later the other phone in my
office rings, a familar voice says "Oh, wrong number."  I
suspect he was war-dialing all the extensions in the
office.  If so, man tech recruiting in Austin is getting
really agressive.

&lt;p&gt; I'm still amazed at the comapny that bought out the premiere
of X-Men and you could get in for no money and a techie
resume.

&lt;p&gt; Weird</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2000 23:45:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>30 Aug 2000</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/AustinBlues/diary.html?start=2</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/AustinBlues/diary.html?start=2</guid>
      <description>I'm using my OSS project as the NULL task for my day job. 
With 20-40 minute run times, it gets a fair amount of time. 
If I leave a rxvt terminal running SSH to my home machine
idle at the shell prompt, it will often drop the
connection.  However, if I am running emacs -nw in the
terminal, it will stay up all day.  Wierd.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2000 01:04:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>30 Aug 2000</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/AustinBlues/diary.html?start=1</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/AustinBlues/diary.html?start=1</guid>
      <description>Wrote some macros to sit at the end of the virtual function
tables and complain at compile-time (best) or run-time
(okay) if not all entries are initialized.  This is the
biggest single source of bugs.  The first half-dozen classes
were clean and I began to wonder if I was closing the barn
after all the horses were gone.  However, they weren't all
gone.  Caught a couple of other errors too.  Also updated
most of the classes to use the new inheritence conventions
and mechanisms.  It took all day and probably saved 3-5 days
of catching them by hand.

&lt;p&gt; Maybe I should have spent more time up front on the
inheritence and virtual function table mechanisms.  Don't
think I could have anticipated all the problems.  Even
hindsight isn't perfect.

&lt;p&gt; I need to figure out how to get the regression tests into
the distribution.  Probably imitate some package like libxml
that is already doing it.  Also need to figure out how to
make --with-z and --without-z really work, even if libxml
doesn't.  Wish there were more docs, examples, and tutorials
for the GNU build tools, including the standard/usual M4
macros.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <pubDate>Tue, 8 Aug 2000 15:18:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <title>8 Aug 2000</title>
      <link>http://www.advogato.org/person/AustinBlues/diary.html?start=0</link>
      <guid>http://www.advogato.org/person/AustinBlues/diary.html?start=0</guid>
      <description>Next time I go looking for a job, I am going to interview
the code too.  I am getting too old to struggle years to
find my way around 200KLOC of undocumented code.  It takes
too long to start becoming effective.  Of course, getting on
a new project is another possibility.

&lt;p&gt; It is a nice contrast, I have a day job with no
documentation and few comments, and a side project
translating Java to C.   The Java code has fairly complete
JavaDoc comments, good additional comments, and some
additional HTML docs.  Finding my way around it is
straightforward.

&lt;p&gt; The day job code probably will take 2-3 years to really know
my way around.  Of course, if I split, that knowledge goes
with me.  This product is just hanging on and needs new
features, bug fixes, and visible progress to stay alive. 
There will probably never be the time &amp;amp; money to really
document it.  I expect this is a description of a project
that has already entered its death spiral.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
